I was just wondering what the best percentage to use was? I don't seem to be able to see anything mentioned about it in the user manual.Thanks

bump. I was wondering about this also, as it isnt mentioned?

Hi guys,I suggest default for normal realistic conditions with weather influence. If you feel you want more turbulence, increase it. Want less? Decrease it. I personally use default and find it very realistic at least in Southern California (we don't get THAT much turbulence here though). So basically please experiment, and let us know what setting works best for you!Best,

If I leave the % box blank is that default?Victor

Hi,Yes, or 50%, or as defaulted by "Normal Defaults" button.Best,

Ok, thanks Damian, will have to experiment with it a little tonight

What does it use to determine turbulance? Does it happen to grab AIRMETs and SIGMETs and plot them?----------------------------------------------------------------John MorganReal World: KGEG, UND Aerospace Spokane Satillite, Private ASEL 141.2 hrs, 314 landings, 46 inst. apprs.Virtual: MSFS 2004"There is a feeling about an airport that no other piece of ground can have. No matter what the name of the country on whose land it lies, an airport is a place you can see and touch that leads to a reality that can only be thought and felt." - The Bridge Across Forever: A Love Story by Richard Bach

Hi,No. Pretty sure just some randomness for now.Hope this helps,JimActiveSky Sales and Supporthttp://www.hifisim.com/images/asv_dev_team.jpg http://www.hifisim.com/images/asv_proud_supporter.jpg

Any thoughts as to using SIGMETs and AIRMETs for data in the furture? I kinda see them as almost being an option like the TAF processing. Not being a programmer or developer though, I don't know what processing power that would sap though. Would be interesting to see it determine turbulence strengths and probabilities off of those though. :-hah----------------------------------------------------------------John MorganReal World: KGEG, UND Aerospace Spokane Satillite, Private ASEL 141.2 hrs, 314 landings, 46 inst. apprs.Virtual: MSFS 2004"There is a feeling about an airport that no other piece of ground can have. No matter what the name of the country on whose land it lies, an airport is a place you can see and touch that leads to a reality that can only be thought and felt." - The Bridge Across Forever: A Love Story by Richard Bach

Hi John,The suggestion has been made. No promises though.Hope this helps,JimActiveSky Sales and Supporthttp://www.hifisim.com/images/asv_dev_team.jpg http://www.hifisim.com/images/asv_proud_supporter.jpg

Hi,We are working on SIGMET/AIRMET processing :)Right now ASv6 uses the wx conditions and terrain to calculate and inject quite a bit of randomness... higher wind speeds, higher temperatures in rising terrain, lower air stability, reported gusts, etc., can all influence both frequency and strength of turb. Coupled with the VAS which is even further influenced from terrain and wind, it ends up being pretty realistic and influenced appropriately a majority of the time (IMHO anyways!)