I'm using ASv6 and I have read a while ago that you don't recommend using time acceleration together with AS. That makes sense if using realtime weather. If you set time acceleration to 4x then after one hour realtime your virtual flight is three hour in the future and of course you can't get realtime wether.But if I'm using archived weather and downloads the weather for four hours then AS have knowledge of the weather four hours in advance. Then could it not correctly update the weather in FS with time acceleration?

Hi,Still not a good idea. Even with an Update Interval of 10 minutes that represents 40 minutes in FS04 plus the distance you flew in those 40 minutes. You may be asking FS and AS to do too much in a brief period of time.Hope this helps,Jimhttp://www.hifisim.com/Active Sky V6 Development Team Active Sky V6 Proud SupporterHiFi Beta TeamRadar Contact Supporter: http://www.jdtllc.com/AirSource Member: http://www.air-source.us/FSEconomy Member:http://www.fseconomy.com/

>Hi,>>Still not a good idea. Even with an Update Interval of 10>minutes that represents 40 minutes in FS04 plus the distance>you flew in those 40 minutes. You may be asking FS and AS to>do too much in a brief period of time.>Maybe 2x to have 10 minutes represent 20 minutes? Maybe my system is powerfull enough to that much in brief a period of time?

Hi,I've had success flying longer (3-5 normal hours) flights at 2x. Anything higher than that, you'll need to accept gaps in weather and general depiction/reporting inconsistencies until you slow it down and a new update takes place...Best,

Wow, I didn't know that. I have flown some long-hauls at 4x before, I didn't realize I could have been missing things.Rhett

>Hi,>>I've had success flying longer (3-5 normal hours) flights at>2x. Anything higher than that, you'll need to accept gaps in>weather and general depiction/reporting inconsistencies until>you slow it down and a new update takes place...>I also tried 2x and didn't notice any direct problems.