March 17, 200521 yr I am also confused. Are the DNA drivers used along with, or instead of, the ATI 5.3 or 5.2 drivers? Howard Jetline Systems: Intel 8th Gen Core i7 8700K (4.8GHz Overclock); GTX 1080 Ti; LG Curved UltraWide 3440x1440 Monitor .
March 17, 200521 yr I installed 5.1, then 5.2 and now 5.3 and I absolutely see no difference between them as far as FS is concerned. If anything, 5.2 and 5.3 seem a bit better. But when I test I make sure my ATI display settings ae exactly the same and I always go to the same spot, using the same aircraft and looking for the same things. Also before I install a new ATI driver I usually go to some ATI forum like on driveheaven.com and read what people generall have to say about it. I only install a new driver if majority number of posts are positive.Michael J.WinXP-Home SP2,AMD64 3500+,Abit AV8,Radeon X800Pro,36GB Raptor,1GB PC3200,Audigy 2 Michael J.
March 17, 200521 yr "I am also confused. Are the DNA drivers used along with, or instead of, the ATI 5.3 or 5.2 drivers?"The DNA's are another set of tweaked Catalysts, just as the Omega's and UniAn's are tweaked Cat's.Superfort, if your Cats were FUBAR'd and then the DNA's solved your problem then the real problem was a bad .ini file when you installed the Cats. Happens some times during a driver install.Greg
Create an account or sign in to comment