September 5, 200817 yr I am in the market for a new computer and put together a configuration after searching through the forums and reading a lot of reviews. I have a few questions if someone can help me. This rig will be running FS9 primarily. Probably will upgrade to FSX later on or set up a dual boot. Here is the configuration I put together:->INTEL, Core
September 5, 200817 yr Here's the standard Q box. It'll run its quad at 3.6Ghz. The E8XXX duals will run at 4.0. For FS, the trade is 10% additional FPS (the rig OPosted) vs better scenery loading (Q box) . . . but that's all. There will be No additional differences in FS.http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWi...tNumber=7159746The cooler suggested is the best available and works fine. No need for water. Arctic Silver is good CPU goop, and DDR2 v 3 is just marketing. The 8800GT is all FS can use.Run Vista 64, put both FSX and FS9 on the boot drive. Defrag with a modern defragger. Go FLy, Way < $1000.
September 5, 200817 yr Author Thanks for posting the Q box. Interesting list. When you say the 8800GT is all FS can use what do you mean? Are their stability problems with other higher end graphic cards with FS9? I saw a post in these forums with a guy running a 280 w fs9 and the FPS were way in the 100s.
September 5, 200817 yr That Thermalright cooler has not been avail on Newegg for quite some time. What other respectable sites are out there that sell it? | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
September 5, 200817 yr The 120 is still around, but I haven't delt with any of the current vendors. Frames per second are 100% CPU dependent once a user had an adequite Vcard "conduit" for that CPU data. The 88 is plenty of "pipe." Any card beyond the 8800GT will provide no benefit. That 100FPS had Nothing to do with the 280. "Stability" is not an issue with any of these vcards.
September 5, 200817 yr >Frames per second are 100% CPU dependent once a user had an>adequite Vcard "conduit" for that CPU data. The 88 is plenty>of "pipe." Any card beyond the 8800GT will provide no benefit.>That 100FPS had Nothing to do with the 280. "Stability" is not>an issue with any of these vcards. If he wants to crank up the resolution and AA then he will benefit from a GTX 200 series card, even with CPU bound games. The other question is are you only going to run FS9 on this machine? If not then I would go for a higher end card than the 8800GT. I would also reconsider the chipset and may be go for a P45 or X48 based motherboard. Nvidia Gaming:ASUS RAMPAGE FORMULA (Intel X48 chipset) BIOS 408Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 w/Thermalright Ultra-120 ExtremeOCZ Titanium XTC 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR2 800 (PC2 6400)EVGA GTX 280 FTW (177.92 Drivers)Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty2x Western Digital Raptor 74GB (RAID 0) - Vista Ultimate 64 Bit/SP1SILVERSTONE 1200Watt DASILVERSTONE TJ09-BATI Gaming:ASUS Rampage Extreme BIOS 0501Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 w/Thermalright True Black Ultra-120 eXtremeOCZ Intel Extreme Edition 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)ATI 4870X2 (Catalyst 8.8)Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty2x Western Digital Raptor 74GB (RAID 0) - Vista Ultimate 64 Bit/SP1LIAN LI PC-A70BPC Power & Cooling T1KWSR 1000WWork Laptop:Dell XPS M1710Intel Core 2 T7600G4GB DDR2 667Nvidia 7950GTX (512 Mb) 175.32 DriversX-Fi Xtreme Audio Notebook160GB SATA Hard Drive (7200RPM)Vista Ultimate/SP1
September 5, 200817 yr Author My intention is to run only FS9 at 1920x1200 on a two-monitor setup. I would like to crank up the AA full right in FS9 if I could, max weather distance, etc.Re-configured system:LIAN LI, Classical PC-A10 Silver Mid-Tower Case, ATX, No PSU, Aluminum PC POWER & COOLING, Silencer
September 5, 200817 yr Author I forgot to add if I can not accomplish that on the 8800 maybe I need to step up to the 280.
September 5, 200817 yr I run 8XAA and 16XAF on a 42" at 19x10, plus a 19" at 12/10. FPS are the same on the 42 or the 19. I had a 260 for a bit. It does not support a second non-sli Vcard. I run a 3rd monitor from a second 8400 Vcard and the 2x0s deactivate the 2nd Vcard. Also, it does not support Vista's sleep function. It made no difference at all in anyhing FS related, it just disabled features I want to use (Like my 3re monitor and sleep). For FS, those are losers.
September 5, 200817 yr >I run 8XAA and 16XAF on a 42" at 19x10, plus a 19" at 12/10.>FPS are the same on the 42 or the 19. >>I had a 260 for a bit. It does not support a second non-sli>Vcard. I run a 3rd monitor from a second 8400 Vcard and the>2x0s deactivate the 2nd Vcard. Also, it does not support>Vista's sleep function. It made no difference at all in>anyhing FS related, it just disabled features I want to use>(Like my 3re monitor and sleep). For FS, those are losers.I don
September 7, 200817 yr Jerel,Are you assembling this yourself or are you purchasing it already assembled? If already assembled, from which merchant? I'm in the market to upgrade my PC as well. Thanks!Rushad
September 7, 200817 yr Author I am purchasing it from http://www.avadirect.com They have barebone kits as well as complete system builds - all flavors.
Create an account or sign in to comment