January 10, 200917 yr I've had route discos I couldn't delete either on normal flights. Usually when adjusting a STAR or IAP. I never knew why it happened, although I didn't pause to really look and see if it was something I was doing wrong, but it happened enough that I didn't feel like it was me.Only happens in the 744 (FS9), not the 737NG or others I have like that. - Chris Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX | Intel Core i9 13900KF | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4090 24 GB | 64GB DDR5 SDRAM | Corsair H100i Elite 240mm Liquid Cooling | 1TB & 2TB Samsung Gen 4 SSD | 1000 Watt Gold PSU | Windows 11 Pro | Thrustmaster Boeing Yoke | Thrustmaster TCA Captain X Airbus | Asus ROG 38" 4k IPS Monitor (PG38UQ) Asus Maximus VII Hero motherboard | Intel i7 4790k CPU | MSI GTX 970 4 GB video card | Corsair DDR3 2133 32GB SDRAM | Corsair H50 water cooler | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SSD (2) | EVGA 1000 watt PSU - Retired
January 10, 200917 yr Not sure what else you could try now.Maybe using something else to build the flightplan and making a custom waypoint instead of the n70 waypoint and seeing if that works.Sorry I couldn't be of more helpRichy David Andrew - desert based - a330/350 rated.
January 10, 200917 yr something different: How can there be 60 nm between 90N74W and 90N106E? It's exactly the same point. Or am I missing something here?Tom Nicolas Maes
January 11, 200917 yr Author something different: How can there be 60 nm between 90N74W and 90N106E? It's exactly the same point. Or am I missing something here?TomI have said before:>Hi Paul,>As I described on the first line, the N90 isn't N90 00.0 but N89 30.0. >The North pole is the middle of 60NM between N90W074 and N90E106.Sincerely,Kan-ichiro Fushihara
January 11, 200917 yr I have said before:>Hi Paul,>As I described on the first line, the N90 isn't N90 00.0 but N89 30.0. >The North pole is the middle of 60NM between N90W074 and N90E106.Sincerely,Kan-ichiro FushiharaHi Kan-ichiro Fushihara,Real life Boeing FMC's have issues near the North Pole, plse read http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagaz...v_by_model.htmlSo maybe an omission in the PMDG progamming might cause this hick up.Also check out http://williams.best.vwh.net/avform.htm#CrsIn short: near polar flights are practically impossible/difficult to compute due to A) fast changing heading references, and :( some trigonomical functions approaching infinity near 90 degrees N/SRegards,Willem
January 11, 200917 yr Author Dear Willem,Thank you very much for your valuable information. I have to study it. In short: near polar flights are practically impossible/difficult to compute due to A) fast changing heading references, and :( some trigonomical functions approaching infinity near 90 degrees N/SAlthough I have intentionally avoided to make a waypoint with the North Pole itself (N90 00.0), I understand clearly LNAV controlled navigation of the PMDG 747-400X is very unstable near the Pole. It seems that I have guessed right.Sincerely,Kan-ichiro Fushihara
January 11, 200917 yr Dear Willem,Thank you very much for your valuable information. I have to study it. Although I have intentionally avoided to make a waypoint with the North Pole itself (N90 00.0), I understand clearly LNAV controlled navigation of the PMDG 747-400X is very unstable near the Pole. It seems that I have guessed right.Sincerely,Kan-ichiro FushiharaYou are welkom,You don't have to study the trigonometry behind the FMC calculations: you can reduce the whole matter by asking yourself this (Zen) question:- What is your heading when you are directly over the North Pole?When you find the answer, you can appreciate the problems involving FMC track calculationsGood Luck and happy landings.Willem
Create an account or sign in to comment