FSCOF? ...do I need it? My thoughts (long)

[slashed2 53]

Scary how you can replace out FSCOF with FSX in nearly every post. I actually just posted something that was nearly verbatim from this thread, goes to show you the same arguments over and over whichever side you are on.Deja vu anyone?Ian.

[MarkRey 16]

could go back further too, but from my standpoint the fs8 - fs9 change in sky was truly drastic. i happily chucked fs8 just for that. I am happy, but not quite as enthused about the fs9 - fsx ground upgradeA little later, when the new fsx birds appear, I'll probably start moving over.regards,MarkXPHomeSP2/FS9.1/3.2HT/1024mb/X700pro256

[Mike S KPDX 597]

wow, this is going backdid I buy it?yes, I did - 8 months after its initial public release.why? - a few of the payware aircraft I was interested in purchasing were developed for the FS9 package. Also, RC was updated with some much needed commands, which also required FS9.a few other thoughts:my assumption on 'interactive VC' was wrong, MS did a great job in this areamy assumption on 'taxiway signs' was wrong, MS did a reasonable job in this areaas for the other comments, I dont know - I think they still hold some water so to speak.eitherway, thanks for digging this up, it is a real blast from the past. :-)

[RobbieHe 0]

Great food-for-thought FSX-related post from 03.RH