It has been released, and I wondered if any buyers could comment on how it is. How is it compared to the Captain Sim and Level-D 767 aircraft? I know the CLS767 is there only for FS9 right now, and the CS767 is only for FSX. Still, people that happen to have them both, what is your opinion on the CLS?

Great looking model and VC, but for the amount of system programming what they charge you for the base price should get you all of the models.I don't know about you guys but I'm not spending 36 bucks on eye candy alone, once you factor in the additional expansions it'll cost you well over 50 dollars.

Great looking model and VC, but for the amount of system programming what they charge you for the base price should get you all of the models.I don't know about you guys but I'm not spending 36 bucks on eye candy alone, once you factor in the additional expansions it'll cost you well over 50 dollars.

I too am reluctant to fork out that much money on an aircraft where you have to spend even more to get the various expansions (that seems very CaptainSimesque!). I already have the Level-D 767 which is a superb aircraft in every way and I would say this sets the standard for the 767 and would be very difficult indeed to beat. BillWindows XP Pro SP2Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 3.0Ghz CPUArctic Cool 7 ProASUS P5N-E-SLI MOtherboard2GB Corsair 800Mhz DDR2 RAM768MB nVidia GeForce 8800GTX Dual VGA Graphics card2x 500GB SATA 7200RPM Hard Drive650W (2 x 12V) PSU1000GB Western Digital external Hard Drive150GB Western Digital External Hard DriveAll running 245GB of fs9 pleasure!

i bought the CLS 767 and here is my opinion:1- Exterior model: excellent2- VC: the best CLS has done so far and it's better than the level-d and comparable to CS quality.3- Flight dynamics: match fairly a LITE product.4- More clickable buttons in VC5- 2D panel is also excellentBUTl1- random OOM occur because of duplicate textures in both the A/C texture folder and FS9 main texture folder. this is simple to overcome and CLS are already working on a patch for that2- Sounds are freeware quality especially the GE when you could barely hear the engines.All in all: It is a good product and it will be interesting if a merge between level-d and CLS is found.

Great looking model and VC, but for the amount of system programming what they charge you for the base price should get you all of the models.I don't know about you guys but I'm not spending 36 bucks on eye candy alone, once you factor in the additional expansions it'll cost you well over 50 dollars.

This is not referring to the CLS767, surely? Sounds more like the CS767 to me.Anyway, I was afraid of the light system programming. Basically, I want a LDS767 with a way better VC. I suppose that's not what CLS is after... and no, the CS767 also is not what I want. I need to be able to save panel states, which is something the CLS767 doesn't provide.*sigh* I wish Level-D would update their 767, so that it would look better, and be more according to present-day standards. Maybe they can do that when their 757 is ready.

I believe that CLS should seriously think of making "unofficial merge instructions" with the LDS 767. There are very many people who want LDS complexity and CLS eye candy together in one package.

*sigh* I wish Level-D would update their 767, so that it would look better, and be more according to present-day standards. Maybe they can do that when their 757 is ready.

Dream on mate, it will never happen. it's all FSX now.

I have FSX, so that won't be much of a problem for me... But I agree, merge instructions to get the LDS and CLS work together would be great.

Wonderful. Not to thrilled about the Exterior detail, Powerplants and all.Currently trying a retrofit w/ ISG1 Gauges with a Smith FMC.But so far the feel taxiing around the tarmac feels great. :( .I'm just :( It won't be a disapointment in flying like the B742. To my Opinion.Regards