Sure, no sweat mate. I didn't mean to bark back, that was not my intention and I apologise if that's how I came across. I just thought the issue regarding FSX code is quite important when discussing FSX. Stephen is far more experienced than most of us in the simming world and certainly me, but I can't help thinking that having read so much about FSX code being such a dog, then I believe it needs to be taken into consideration. From what Stephen says, his opinion seems to suggest that there is no problem with the code, that is certainly not how I understand things. Perhaps we are all out of kilter with the whole FSX code thing anyway. Maybe the only reason why the FSX code 'appears' to be a dog, is that virtually everyone's rig simply isn't capable enough to run it smoothly and adequately, due to the massive graphics draw on the CPU. It's only when guys like Stephen who have the knoweledge and expertise , not to mention a rig to die for, that they can make the whole thing come together. But for mere mortals who perhaps only have a modest to hi-end rig with only a moderate knowlede of tweaking and understand of the workings of FSX, then we never get to that level of satisfaction with FSX . I hope that made sense. Just had a night of wine, watched 'The Beach' and now I'm off to bed, cheers.

And I apologize too,,, I hope i did not offend anyone.. besides, the cat made me do it

besides, the cat made me do it