February 13, 201214 yr Hard to judge how Flight performs,the Beta was smooth as butter according to most people with various gpu's ranging from low to high end.Then when you consider that -90% of FSX features are currently left out of Flight it would really be dissapointing if it didn't run so well. Edited February 13, 201214 yr by booterboy Gigabyte P67A-UD7-B3 / i7 2600k @4.5ghz /Coolit vantage Silverstone Temjin TJ11-W /Coolermaster 1200w psu/gtx 580/Dell 30'' monitor Corsair vengeance 8gb / WD Raptor 300gb RAID 0
February 13, 201214 yr Here in Texas, our summers reached 105deg F for stretches of 60 days in a row. Luckily I don't live in a tent! :( It's 70 deg F in my home, and I have no problems with my i5-2500k overclocked to 4.4 Cheers, Jonathan
February 13, 201214 yr 2.8ghz quad will be absolutely plenty for flight. just make sure you have a semi-decent graphics card. i have a gut feeling that a 5770 runs flight really well at medium settings.i also have a gut feeling that if a person was to upgrade to a 6870, their gut would tell them, and me, that the guts of flight would run on high.for FSX, you need really high clock speeds. I run a 1055T at 3.4ghz and it's my bottle neck for FSX. Flight is coded well from what i hear and will run fine on a 2.8ghz quad.