I feel sorry for the many fans of Emma Field. I was on the Lago site tonight and noticed the release date for the 2004 version of this scenery to be '12/5/2004'... :-hangGuys, there no excuse for crap like this... Lago is going to make everyone wait until almost Christmas of this year to release an update to a small GA airfield. Of all the many International airports that have been updated from 2002 to 2004, this is ridicules.Since the restructuring of this company, things have really gotten out of had over at Lago. I doubt if I'll ever count on anything from then anymore...

"12/5/2004"Could mean May 12, 2004. Evenso, things haven't been going all that smoothly at LAGO recently. One might not want to put too much faith in a firm release date.Greg

I read some post over on their site and it looks like there must be a misprint with what they posted as the release date...I still think things have been a little suspect since the company restructuring....

no, there is no misprint.There's just different dateformats in use in different countries :-)MM/DD/YYYYDD/MM/YYYYYYYYMMDDYYYYDDMMetc. etc. etc.

I guess your right, I mis-read the date... As you can see I'm pulling a late one tonight...I hope Lago can get things under control for future releases. Many of us are still waiting for that FSE update. My fingers are crossed for a May release of Emma Field 2004...

I've been waiting for Emma Field 2004 for a long time.As a founder of the Emma Field Flying Club I'm more interested than most in the product...

LAGO = Euro companyEuro = day/month/year

Why don't everybody uses ISO format as they should beats me. Jos

Simply because there's no standard set.And even if there were, noone outside of IT departments would understand YYYYMMDD which is the closest to a standard you can get.

ISO8601and the format is YYYY-MM-DD already accepted by 75% of the countries. IEEE and W3C recomendations for web pages also follow the ISO format.Jos

My own little protest is not to buy anything from Lago til this scenery is done. Plenty of other things to buy nowadays.

Yeah, YYYYMMDD is the correct way! As is the 24h time format and the metric system!!(Just trying to provoke our english-speaking friends a bit here :-lol )rgrdsfredrik granfors

>Yeah, YYYYMMDD is the correct way! As is the 24h time format>and the metric system!!>>(Just trying to provoke our english-speaking friends a bit>here :-lol ):)I agree, 24 hr format makes sooooo much sense. It really does. I hate the PM/AM business that we have in the US.Metric - what crazed guy decided to make a system that had continutity between the measurements?