Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello ,

I want to buy a new I7 4770K Build for FSX , I have a couple of questions .

My budget is around 1500 USD when no GPU included (I am going to use my brand new GTX 570 (I know its old and so but I have him only 2 months ...) a new GTX 770 is more 550-620 USD which my budget doesnt have...

 

Lets start :

 

1. Is the NHD14 Is better then the H100i for cooling the 4770k ?

2. Is a samsung 840 PRO is a must ? or i can stick with the normal 840...(its 120 USD difference where I am living at)

3. Do I really have to upgrade my GPU to for a GTX 770 ? PCIE3 and etc..(I have my GTX570 only 2 months it is new (warranty change from a preview is a burned GTX480)..

 

Thank you very much !

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

If you have only a single monitor  no more than 24" one, then your GTX570 should be fine

Manny

Beta tester for SIMStarter 

Posted

If you have only a single monitor  no more than 24" one, then your GTX570 should be fine

yep ,

I have 24' samsung and only one monitor...

Posted

 

 

Is the NHD14 Is better then the H100i for cooling the 4770k ?

 

Not sure for the 4770K, but I doubt it would be different to the 3770K. This will be helpful...

 

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/corsair_h110_review,13.html

 

As you can see, the H100i, achieves 75 degrees set to it's maximum and noisy fan RPM.

 

While the NH-D14 achieves 72 degrees, and is much quieter.

 

Noise levels here...

 

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/corsair_h110_review,11.html

Posted

I just put together a 4770K system myself and even with Euro Ripoff Prices™,  it was less than $1,000, though I kept some parts from my old system (SSD, HDD, video card).

 

1. Closed-loop water cooling and high performance air cooling are pretty similar in terms of noise and performance. To really benefit from water cooling, you need a custom built system. Water cooling held a greater advantage before air coolers started using heat pipes. I went with the Phanteks PH-TC14PE. The Noctua is similar, maybe a few degrees higher:

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Phanteks/PH-TC14PE/6.html

 

2. When it comes to SSD's, even the slowest ones are massively faster than even the fastest 10,000 RPM hard drive. Therefore, when buying an SSD, I always go with the highest capacity drive for the price. You won't notice the difference between a fast and a slow SSD, but you will notice when your 120GB SSD gets full, where as a 250GB model would still have 130GB free...

 

3. If all you play is FSX/P3D, the GTX 570 is totally overkill. Unlike modern games, FS does not offload a lot of work to the GPU. Almost everything is done by the CPU. Even with my 4770K overclocked to 4.3 GHz and a GTX 460, I'm actually CPU limited - I can tell, because there's absolutely no performance difference when changing the resolution or going from no anti-aliasing to 16XS AA.

With other, modern games, there might be some benefit, but I would try them with the current GPU first. Remember that new GPUs are coming out every year, so if you can hold off for a year, something much faster and more advanced than the GTX 770 will come out for the same price.

Asus Prime X370 Pro / Ryzen 7 3800X / 32 GB DDR4 3600 MHz / Gainward Ghost RTX 3060 Ti
MSFS / XP

Posted

Not sure for the 4770K, but I doubt it would be different to the 3770K. This will be helpful...

 

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/corsair_h110_review,13.html

 

As you can see, the H100i, achieves 75 degrees set to it's maximum and noisy fan RPM.

 

While the NH-D14 achieves 72 degrees, and is much quieter.

 

Noise levels here...

 

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/corsair_h110_review,11.html

 

I have seen it aleardy.. the question is if its the same with the 4770K... from what I have been told, in the bencmarks it is but I am not sure...

Posted

o.k I see..

What about the following ? seems o.k ? (GPU- GTX570 OC) :
 

 
Intel Core i7 4770K Haswell 3.5Ghz 8MB L3 Cache s1150
Noctua NH-D14 CPU Cooler
Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H LGA1150, Intel Z87, DDR3 1600 
Corsair 2x4GB DDR3 1600Mhz Vengeance Blue Dual Channel CL9-9-9-24  
Seagate 1TB Barracuda 7200RPM 64MB Sata III ST1000DM003 
Samsung 840 Series 2.5'' 250GB SSD SATA III 
LG DVD±RW GH24NS x24 Black SATA OEM 
Corsair TX650M 650W Modular Active PFC 14cm Fan 
Antec Eleven Hundred The Advanced Gaming Authority Case No PSU 

is a thermal paste changing will add something ?
I mean changing the original Intel thermal paste even before the first use...
 
price 1550 $ (I am not from the u.s , prices are higher..)

Thank you very much for the kind help !
Posted

 

 


3. If all you play is FSX/P3D, the GTX 570 is totally overkill.

 

I'm not so sure about that statement Jimmi.

 

I went from a GTX580 to a GTX680... and I saw a significant improvement in IQ and some fps (increasing autogen too).  And I will say "visions of a Titan dance in my head".

 

I am running a pair of Samsung 830s and am quite happy with those.  Like you say... drive space important.  Both are 256GB and my C: drive running a little short (because I have a lot of FRAPS recordings on there... I could move tho).  The D: FSX drive is 133 used / 104 free and that with most Orbx areas (just one airport) and some other sceneries.... also many planes.  Also, having an older style "platter" drive... a large one... is nice for backing up stuff.

 

Martin mentions fan noise on the H100i... I can't say I have ever heard the H100 fans (but I do have a pair of Zalmons closer to me that are quite noisy).  That said - tempting to have a NH-D14 as one has to only be concerned with fan failure (rare) compared to the pump failing on the Corsair units (which I haven't had "yet").

Posted

The Beauty of the H100i is the software that it comes with. The software will control the fan speed automatically once you set your temperature profiles. My 2600K OC'd @ 4.8Ghz never goes above 70c, which means my fans never go full speed, and I can hardly hear them.

 

Diego

Posted

 

3. If all you play is FSX/P3D, the GTX 570 is totally overkill. Unlike modern games, FS does not offload a lot of work to the GPU. 

 

Gotta totally disagree with this (a few months ago when I didn't know better I would have agreed though).  As soon as you start using NI to set set high levels of AA the GPU usage shoots up noticeably.  Even in stock scenery if I put bufferpools to 0 on my old i7-860 cpu and set frames to unlimited and run REX weather with a good amount of clouds (just real weather with storms in the area) with just 4xS AA and 2xSGSS in DX9 mode I could make my gpu usage shoot to 99% in default scenery around KSAC which is not scenery heavy at all.  Even using bufferpools it's way up there with unlimited FPS.  Granted this is on a GTX560 Ti but it shows that a modern GPU can be taxed with the right settings while running FSX.

AMD Ryzen 5950X |  Asus Crosshair VIII Hero | Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090 w/EK waterblock | Full Custom Loop Cooling | GSkill Trident Z Neo 2x16GB DDR4-3600 | Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Samsung 860 Evo 2TB | Phanteks Enthoo 719 | Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 1000W | Steelseries M750 TKL | SteelSeries Prime Wireless | Honeycomb Alpha and Bravo | Logitech Pro Flight Pedals | LG 34GN850 | Asus PG279Q | Win 11 Pro

Posted

 

1. Closed-loop water cooling and high performance air cooling are pretty similar in terms of noise and performance. To really benefit from water cooling, you need a custom built system. Water cooling held a greater advantage before air coolers started using heat pipes. I went with the Phanteks PH-TC14PE. The Noctua is similar, maybe a few degrees higher:

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Phanteks/PH-TC14PE/6.html

 

2. When it comes to SSD's, even the slowest ones are massively faster than even the fastest 10,000 RPM hard drive. Therefore, when buying an SSD, I always go with the highest capacity drive for the price. You won't notice the difference between a fast and a slow SSD, but you will notice when your 120GB SSD gets full, where as a 250GB model would still have 130GB free...

 

3. If all you play is FSX/P3D, the GTX 570 is totally overkill. Unlike modern games, FS does not offload a lot of work to the GPU. Almost everything is done by the CPU. Even with my 4770K overclocked to 4.3 GHz and a GTX 460, I'm actually CPU limited - I can tell, because there's absolutely no performance difference when changing the resolution or going from no anti-aliasing to 16XS AA.

With other, modern games, there might be some benefit, but I would try them with the current GPU first. Remember that new GPUs are coming out every year, so if you can hold off for a year, something much faster and more advanced than the GTX 770 will come out for the same price.

 

GTX 460 is to weak for fsx if you want high performance with high quality addons and good graphics - for example NGX+ORBX+FSDT+UTX+GEX+REX+AS2012...

 Even Titan has a big FPS drop in REX HD clouds. So, 570 can't be a overkill. Actually, at least GTX580 is recommended... If not 580, then 680 or higher from series 6

@amir737, you will be fine with GTX570

Posted

Its just a budget problem to upgrade my gpu right now... I will upgrade in the future to high end series.. I am not expecting top gpu performance , I just want to make sure that the performance will be "fine" , and that I wont get bottleneck..

Guest jjcruz78
Posted

I will suggested to try to fine a sandybridge if you can. Here is why:

 

  1. Yes 10-20 % slower clock for clock, but with much higher overclocking potential

 

  2. It is a more robust part it will last you longer (more bank for your buck)

 

  3. Don't have to delind (ivy or haswell), so you will still keep your warranty

 

   4. The scaling of the new intel trigate transistor so far is showing that is not scaling that well and also creating a lot of heat issues

 

   5. We all want to see our hobby cont. , but the reality is more advance hardware wont make FSX run that much better (maybe incrementally better at most-not worth it in my opinion)

 

    P.S. Hopefully X-10 will let us use more of our modern hardware more effectible...... Just my two cents!!!!

 

 

     Anyway best of luck with your upgrade!!!!

Posted

IMO, Do not go for a Sandy Bridge unless you get a real $$$ savings for the CPU and MB etc

 

I remember this same argument when IB came out.

 

If I were to build a new PC today..I would go for a Haswell unless some can prove to me clock for clock Haswell is slower than IB (let alone SB)

Manny

Beta tester for SIMStarter 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...