If someone could show me some comparison shots, I shall stand corrected, though.

 

 Here's a start. http://s1368.photobucket.com/user/Dave_YVR/slideshow/Various%20FSX%20Screens  Models are quite accurate and liveries are crisp and correct, even the engine types are correct.

 

 vs.

http://www.simflight.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/MyTraffic_X_5-4-C.jpg

 

http://www.simflight.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/MT-upgrade.jpg

 

http://img.informer.com/screenshots/3519/3519605_1.jpg

 

 Sure there's a bit of a performance hit, it just depends on your system and what you want out of your AI. I want mine to look good and it does.

Is the slideshow UTII?

Is the slideshow UTII?

 

No sir, the slideshow is using the freeware models, paints and plans. Mostly available here from Alpha India Group, FAIB, The Fruit Stand, AIA, AIM, OSP, UTT and many others. UT2 does use models made by TFS, and AIA as well so for most of the major airlines the models are the same but compiled for FSX.

 

 

Here's a start. http://s1368.photobu...ous FSX Screens Models are quite accurate and liveries are crisp and correct, even the engine types are correct.

I stand corrected, Dave - those models do indeed look very good. But I highly doubt that my computer is capable of displaying such models as AI, I think I can count the frames myself then .

 

 

But I highly doubt that my computer is capable of displaying such models as AI

 

 Thanks Florian, I think you'd be surprised.

I'm actually considering that for my new favorite area of flying - using FAIB and such for my new AI does indeed sound cool, and the few planes that might actually fly to and from the Austrian airports may indeed not have too much effect. I'll definitely report back.