June 12, 201411 yr Well now...just a minute ago, I thought to see what ORBX's CYSE looks like in FSX. So..I fired the old girl up..and guess what? At the same airport...same parking location...same everything...where I had 27-30 FPS in P3D v2.2, I only generated 14-17 FPS in FSX! So what does that suggest...well..that LM REALLY leveraged the code...jeez...I lost half my FPS with the same exact scenery package with it running in FSX. I never would have expected that, let me tell ya! Back to the FSX flight...to see what else will be different.... Post Edit: Well, FSX must have needed to run a little while longer...as soon after I posted this...my FPS came up to near what is in P3D. So, this post no longer applies..somehow, something in the next few minutes of FSX running, stabilized (buffers perhaps?!?) the FPS, and all is well in either platform. Disregard.....
June 12, 201411 yr Author So the performance of FSX and P3D2.2 are identical? Yep..pretty much on my system. It was weird...FPS came up after about five minutes of running CYSE in FSX. No explanation, I can offer for it.
June 15, 201411 yr So the performance of FSX and P3D2.2 are identical? If you use "frame rates" and ONLY "frame rates" as a measure of performance, then there will be some who could use that as an argument that performance is identical. However, I think it is fair to say that there has been a significant performance improvement overall. Some of it measurable and some not quite so.
Create an account or sign in to comment