Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mrvoyager

New 64 bit Flight Sim and PMDG aircraft soon?

Recommended Posts

I'm playing aWorld War 2 sim named "War Thunder", and I get very high frame rates, and the scenery and aircrafts are very nice. In FSX or P3d I doubt I'd get more than 20-25 fps with that scenery, but I get 55-65 fps with War Thunder... I feel the flight model very realistic too... So, we see we need a completely new platform for future flight simulators. 

Another sim to watch out is Aerofly FS, which is at the beginning but looks promissing in the future.

Share this post


Link to post

Imagine if they put PAPI, ATC, ATIS, Wx send/receive weather stations, VORD, VOR, NDB, DME, ILS, LOC, global jet and victor route networks, controlled area boundaries, transitions, FAF, IDF, Approaches, 24500 airports, client network server, entire world drawn >100Nm distance, etc. into War Thunder, would be a bit of a drag on fps. :Black Eye:


Steve Waite: Engineer at codelegend.com

Share this post


Link to post

Hello yidahoo,

 

I have followed your advise and purchased the Saab340., It is a nice plance, no doubt about that but it seems heavier on the frames than the 757 Professional for instance.

 

Speaking of frames. It was only until i started dispaying the framerate on my screen that i began to realize i was actually flying in slow motion in some parts of the world due to heavy rendering settings.

 

When you don\t see the fps in x-plane you lead an ignorant life i realize now. The screen doesn't stutter and the simulation seems to be smooth. I think there are lots of users not realizing that they are actually flying in slow motion. I began to notice this when listening at the frequency drop of my windscreen whipers

 

Since that moment tweaking the rendering settings so as to keep a constant 20 fps is required. So i have been fooling myself.


Antoine v Heck
---
Ryzen 5800X3D, 32Gb DDR4 RAM@1600 Mhz, RTX3090 (24GB VRAM). 2TB SSD - VR with Quest 2 via link cable 

Share this post


Link to post

Yes, the Saab is probably the most frame rate heavy X-Plane aircraft but probably the most complex too. I believe 19fps is the point where X-Plane slows things down, but if you tweak your configuration so that the Saab in heavy scenery is above 20fps, then virtually everything else will run well over 20fps. Also 20fps looks more smoother than 40-50 locked in FSX or P3D.


Jason E Row

Follow me on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/user/JasonRowPhotography

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...