January 14, 201511 yr I just got a new computer for FSX, I7 4790K, 8GB of Ram and NVIDIA 970 GPU. If I plan on running FSX, should I get the DX-10 fix, is there any fall outs or cuase of more CTD while using this? Sorry brand new to this topic, thanks! Edit- I might go to P3D if that is a better option than sticking with FSX. Anthony Neumann
January 14, 201511 yr I just got a new computer for FSX, I7 4790K, 8GB of Ram and NVIDIA 970 GPU. If I plan on running FSX, should I get the DX-10 fix, is there any fall outs or cuase of more CTD while using this? Sorry brand new to this topic, thanks! Edit- I might go to P3D if that is a better option than sticking with FSX. As long as you set up fsx's settings properly, you should have no problems. FSX & P3D are 32bit. You can run into VAS limits with both sims. MSFS 2024 is my sim choice everyday and twice on Sundays.
January 25, 201511 yr FSX under DX10 Preview, fixed by Steve's Fixer program is, in my opinion, a far superior graphic output, than running under native DX9. Other's might disagree, but for myself, I wouldn't run FSX.x under anything but DX10.
January 25, 201511 yr I agree with Sesquashtoo--It doesn't double my frame rates and make everything look photorealistic, but it does allow me to maintain smooth flying in areas and/or weather that puts a load on the hardware. This more than anything helped me squeeze performance out of my low-end system and I wouldn't fly without it. Richard P. Kelly
Create an account or sign in to comment