Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Kermit_70

Carenado F33A vs. A2A Cessna 182 ?

Recommended Posts

Undoubtedly A2A ! For what you want to do, forget the other !

 

Regards,

 

Richard Portier


Richard Portier

MAXIMUS VI FORMULA|Intel® Core i7-4770K Oc@4.50GHz x8|NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080ti|M16GB DDR3|Windows10 Pro 64|P3Dv5|AFS2|TrackIr5|Saitek ProFlight Yoke + Quadrant + Rudder Pedal|Thrustmaster Warthog A10|

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, kind of a Frankenthread, but what the heck. 

 

I expect you're referring to the new Reality Expansion Pack that's just been released for the XP version of the F33.  I wonder if anyone who's flown a comparable A2A plane - say the Comanche - and the F33 with the new REP could comment and compare.  The REP certainly sounds interesting, but does it really take the XP F33 to A2A levels?  Color me just a bit skeptical for a number of practical reasons, including the ability of the A2A to include a variety of full-featured GPS's from F1, RXP and Mindstar, but my mind remains open.

 

Scott

 

Well Scott, I just picked up the combination of the F33 and REP today, so I really can't judge yet.  I do own and fly all of A2A's GA offerings as well as a few of their warbirds. I should of, however, phrased my sentence slightly differently: "In XP, as of now, the F33 looks to be very much on par with A2A type offerings!".

 

There's obviously differences in platforms, in that you reference F1, RXP and Mindstar.  A2A isn't alone in integration in MSFS based sims, but in XP we have a generally decent GNS unit bundled with the platform and that's all.  There's also the fact that the newer A2A offerings are graphically superior to the older Carenado textures.

 

Aside from that however, I was talking about systems depth, and so far, from what I can tell, REP adds a ton of it, including all the little stuff like flooding and the effects of oil viscosity at cold temps, wear on components, damage, etc.

 

It remains to be seen, however, if it manages to unseat my favorite 'in-depth' GA, which is still Marcel Felde's DA-20.  I prefer it above all of A2A's aircraft.


Jim Stewart

Milviz Person.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bonanza is about 30 knots faster and will preform better FPS wise.


ATP MEL,CFI,CFII,MEI.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Real world airplane comparison:

 

WINNER - Bonanza F33

 

 

Simulated / Brand comparison

 

WINNER - A2A C182

 

 

...both clear winners in their category.


Bill

UK LAPL-A (Formerly NPPL-A and -M)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...