buraktunahan

Alabeo Diamond DA 62 Project

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody.

Alabeo Company plans to do DA62 after Diamond DA42? That would be great. I'm sure many people agree with me. :smile:

 

CFphFJM.jpg

GC23sNd.jpg

zuFBZK3.jpg

rCOCNuN.jpg

058gP0l.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

Would be great and I look forward to tweaking their lousy FDE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would absolutely love to see the da 62. Areobask just released the da62 for xplane. It looks beautiful and I'm really thinking about switching to xplane for a little to fly it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mate, forget it! I'm a pilot and recently start flying the da62. Because I m a flight sim enthusiastic I decided to purchase the diamond da62 for X-Plane 11. Oh My God! What a waste of money! It looks beautiful but in reality the aircraft does not look anything closer to the real one. Nothing works. After few minutes playing around with it I have noticed a lot of bugs and things that actually does not make any sense. I emailed the company Aerobask but so far nobody replied back. These people from Aerobask are amateur, they are not even into aviation. What do they know about aircraft performance and system?

good luck for you if you decide to go ahead and buy this crap

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Callsignrobin mentioned he had the chance to fly one, it's really amazing aircraft! I started flying it and I don't want to stop. Every time I go to work I just go happy with a big smile on my face. But when you try this Aerobask one you feel like... offensive initials not allowed!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, alexsandrocaires said:

Hi mate, forget it! I'm a pilot and recently start flying the da62. Because I m a flight sim enthusiastic I decided to purchase the diamond da62 for X-Plane 11. Oh My God! What a waste of money! It looks beautiful but in reality the aircraft does not look anything closer to the real one. Nothing works. After few minutes playing around with it I have noticed a lot of bugs and things that actually does not make any sense. I emailed the company Aerobask but so far nobody replied back. These people from Aerobask are amateur, they are not even into aviation. What do they know about aircraft performance and system?

good luck for you if you decide to go ahead and buy this crap

This is absolute nonsense.

The Aerobask DA-62 is, in my opinion, the best GA aircraft released for any sim I've used.  It's exquisite.  Your comment that "nothing works" is bizarre, considering that it's almost fully functional including circuit breakers, accurate icing simulation, accurate oxygen use and depletion, etc, etc.

I'd encourage anyone interested in the DA-62 to check reviews on YouTube, or the .org forum, and you'll see little but commendation for this truly stunning aircraft.

Quote

"These people from Aerobask are amateur, they are not even into aviation. What do they know about aircraft performance and system?"

- Or, you can take this guy's word for it!! 😁

This guy has 2 posts on AVSIM; both to slate the Aerobask DA-62, so I think we can assume there's an axe to grind here.

Edited by JYW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, JYW said:

This is absolute nonsense.

This guy has 2 posts on AVSIM; both to slate the Aerobask DA-62, so I think we can assume there's an axe to grind here.

I'll second that.

Good call Bill. :-)

(Alexesandro - I'm seriously doubting you've ever been in the cockpit of anything except the  hideous construction of your own (non-flying) warped mind - sorry! - this is AVSIM - we call it like we see it - and yes, I'm a pilot and I've flown the DA-42 several times but would really like to fly the DA-62)

Got any hints?

Edited by ganter
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JYW said:

This is absolute nonsense.

The Aerobask DA-62 is, in my opinion, the best GA aircraft released for any sim I've used.  It's exquisite.  Your comment that "nothing works" is bizarre, considering that it's almost fully functional including circuit breakers, accurate icing simulation, accurate oxygen use and depletion, etc, etc.

I'd encourage anyone interested in the DA-62 to check reviews on YouTube, or the .org forum, and you'll see little but commendation for this truly stunning aircraft.

- Or, you can take this guy's word for it!! 😁

This guy has 2 posts on AVSIM; both to slate the Aerobask DA-62, so I think we can assume there's an axe to grind here.

Just want to give an  example. On the ground with engines running pull up the landing gear circuit breaker and tell me what happen and then  compare to the real aircraft. Hey, it just a little thing, this crap has a lot of things that do not work compared to the real one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ganter said:

I'll second that.

Good call Bill. 🙂

(Alexesandro - I'm seriously doubting you've ever been in the cockpit of anything except the  hideous construction of your own (non-flying) warped mind - sorry! - this is AVSIM - we call it like we see it - and yes, I'm a pilot and I've flown the DA-42 several times but would really like to fly the DA-62)

Got any hints?

If you agree with this Aerobask aircraft is accurate, I doubt you have flown any real da42. I'm not here to show off or list all the aircrafts I have flown so far, I am here to show you guys that this aircraft I paid a good money for, doesn't worth any money, it should be freeware. Very disappointed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, alexsandrocaires said:

Just want to give an  example. On the ground with engines running pull up the landing gear circuit breaker and tell me what happen and then  compare to the real aircraft. Hey, it just a little thing, this crap has a lot of things that do not work compared to the real one

I take it you mean 'pull' the Gear CB -So why would you do that?

It's not part of the Run Up or before Take Off Check List?

 

Hell, I've just checked for the DA-42 (which I fly RW) - and it's not even part of the Pre-Flight - after Battery On.

Alexansdro - time to reconsider just what the hell you think you're doing on this forum.

Edited by ganter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ganter said:

I take it you mean 'pull' the Gear CB -So why would you do that?

It's not part of the Run up or Before Take Off CHK?

NO it's not part of the checklist, but if you have a landing gear failure in real life something will happen. If you pull the landing gear breaker out on real aircraft it will behave the way we expect. But with the Aerobask one it does absolutely nothing, maximum you can see is the breakers popped out, nothing else. Have you had the chance to navigate through the MFD on the real aircraft? This one from Aerobask doesn't get closer to the real one. The gaming 1000 NXi has not been reproduced the way it should by the Aerobask people, and these are just few things I have noticed after I purchased this thing. I just needed 5 minutes to realise how terrible this aircraft is compared to the real one. I'm here complaining because I have to right to.do.so, after all I paid the money they asked, and I expected something good. For someone who just want to fly without any flying knowledge, that's fine. But for someone who actually use the flight simulator to perform and do the tasks as real as the real world is, forget it! By the way, the stand by instrument has the knob on the wrong side, just another mistake out of dozens or more

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me know where you fly - if you really do...

 

So I can avoid the airspace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ganter said:

Let me know where you fly - if you really do...

 

So I can avoid the airspace.

Better, at least I won't have an amateur flying around me or on my way... Safe flying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No - you Safe Flying - don't leave the ground.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ganter said:

Let me know where you fly - if you really do...

 

So I can avoid the airspace.

The way you sent this message you clearly say you are a professional pilot. Again I'm  it here to show off or try to prove I am better than anyone, but you have gone far.

I do fly single/multi engine aircrafts. prop and jets. I recently started flying the da62 amongst another 4 that's includes a bombardier challenge. But if you consider yourself a PRO, please answer a simple question. What happen when you pull out the circuit breaker labeled GEAR on the LH Main Bus Panel? I'm talking on the real aircraft.

Just another thing, the parking brake lever there is no inscription for REALEASE OR LOCK positions. Another little thing this people from Aerobask forgot to write in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alexsandrocaires said:

Better, at least I won't have an amateur flying around me or on my way... Safe flying

Who do you fly for; Troll Airlines?

Tosser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ganter said:

Who do you fly for; Troll Airlines?

Tosser.

Who cares do I fly for? The point here is this crap aircraft the I paid to have it and I have all the right to speak up and tell everyone how I wasted my money. I don't work for airlines, I do work for powerful company that owns about 10 aircrafts  from cirrus sr22/jet, da62s throutgh bombardier and Gulfstream g550. But I am thinking about something, you must be part of this Aerobask group. Maybe you are one of the private pilot who design this baby toys for flight simulator. This is the reason you are taking the conversation to a different path. Anyone who understand and know the da62 will agree with me, but those who just saw pictures or videos of this aircraft on YouTube will thing the Aerobask aircraft is indeed a replica of the real one. Be cool man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Look, I get it that you're coming from the direction of being someone, somewhere in the world with a shed load of cash and have a few planes - I've spent my career pandering to you guys - and it's been a good living for me.

But you don't add up.

You appear to have joined Avsim - your first post - and your last - simply to slag off this aircraft.

We see through it. We see through you. Do you get that?

 

At the very least - photos of you flying the DA-62, or you don't fly the DA-62 and you are, as I reasonably suspect; full of sh*t ....... GO!

Prove me wrong. Here's me doing it. Now you...

fl2.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by ganter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

@alexsandrocaires,

Ok, let's say that the highly specific, non-checklist event that you describe with the landing gear CB isn't functional.   That's one very small factor that I dare say wouldn't upset 99.99% users of this model.

Can you list all of the other "problems" that justify reaching conclusions such as ;

- it's crap

- it's utter crap

- Aerobask "aren't even into aviation".

- it should be freeware.

Surely you're not basing that lot of diatribe above on this one bizarre fixation with a landing gear circuit breaker.

Wonderful, high end complex models like the PMDG 737 NGX have no modelled circuit breakers.   Are you suggesting they too are "crap" and should be freeware?

Edited by JYW
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the x-plane version simulate the run up correctly when pushing the two buttons.  The alebao version of the 42 does not do it and I question their attention to detail on the 62. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, MarkW said:

Does the x-plane version simulate the run up correctly when pushing the two buttons.  The alebao version of the 42 does not do it and I question their attention to detail on the 62. 

Mark, the OP is referring to the Aerobask DA-62 - Alabeo haven't made a 62 - yet!

You're right about the ECU buttons not being simulated on the DA-42 - it's a bit shoddy of them I agree.

I think we've got someone with (as Bill above stated) has an axe to grind with Aerobask or something like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/18/2018 at 11:56 PM, JYW said:

@alexsandrocaires,

Ok, let's say that the highly specific, non-checklist event that you describe with the landing gear CB isn't functional.   That's one very small factor that I dare say wouldn't upset 99.99% users of this model.

Can you list all of the other "problems" that justify reaching conclusions such as ;

- it's crap

- it's utter crap

- Aerobask "aren't even into aviation".

- it should be freeware.

Surely you're not basing that lot of diatribe above on this one bizarre fixation with a landing gear circuit breaker.

Wonderful, high end complex models like the PMDG 737 NGX have no modelled circuit breakers.   Are you suggesting they too are "crap" and should be freeware?

Unbelievable! Your friend posted a picture of him paying around with a Sep aircraft to prove he is a pilot! Well I understand, I used to do such thing 15 years ago while flying PA28s and cessnas when I was building my hours towards my cpl. Sit and wait, I'm a professional and one thing you will never see is a picture of me flying on duty, privacy is the word. He don't really understand what is the point here. I'm here to show that this aerobask da62 is indeed a crap aircraft. The CB is just an example of what I have found that does not work. I paid for that the same way I paid for my p3d 737PMDG. By the way, 89usd well spent. That's is a real aircraft. I would mind to pay 100usd for this da62, as longer it works. But the money I spent was a just wasted. Before coming here, actually on the same day I purchased it and tested I emailed Aerobask, do you know what they replied? Nothing, no replies! I think it would be fair if they could provide a demo aircraft for a trial, so we test and it we like, buy it. I really regret the day I decided to buy it.

They can now announce that their aircraft was tested by real pilots, but I am sure they will omitt the tests result.

I'm done here. Good luck for those who have decided to buy it, after all as I said before, if you just want to play this without a proper realism, go for it, but if you are a real pilot and wish to use your flight simulator to practice and do the procedures as we do in real environment, look this aircraft like a cumulus nimbus, we want to be far away for at least 25nm.

 

Safe flight fellow pilot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A man will be along shortly with a big ol' padlock I reckon. :biggrin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now