I'd be in heaven!! :)

If they would make a DHC-2 Beaver (all versions) I'd be in Heaven! I'm hoping with the success of the 206 they will continue with this type of addon.I'd like a 208 from them as well, would beat the others that are out for sureRegards, MichaelKDFWhttp://www.calvirair.com/mcpics/mcdcvabanner.jpgCalVirAir International

if they would make a Mooney Ovation id be in heaven !regards, tom.

If they made a Lancair IVP I'd give 'em my first born (and feel like I came out way ahead in the deal :-) ).Greg

but RealAir could do these jobs too in my opinion ;) i trust em on this.regards, tom.

Ive actually never owned a real air addon. what they make just doesn't appeal to me, I guess. Carnado has mastered the cessnas, and I am sure they could do a 208, passenger, cargo, and a float version as well.But for now, I will enjoy feeltheres. Even though it isnt as good as I'd like, it is still a fun little airplane.

>If they would make a DHC-2 Beaver (all versions) I'd be in>Heaven! I fail to see how they could outgun the Aerosoft model.

easily... but i would prefer a carenado 172, anyway! :-lol

HelloBy giving it a really nice VC with quality textures and some good custom gauges, The Aerosoft Beaver is the best version so far but is far from being in the carenado league.

>>I fail to see how they could outgun the Aerosoft model. >I think almost any developer could outgun the Aerosoft version of the Beaver pretty easily. That has got to be one of the worst VC

>>>>>I fail to see how they could outgun the Aerosoft model. >>>>I think almost any developer could outgun the Aerosoft version>of the Beaver pretty easily. That has got to be one of the>worst VC

Gotta say that - post first patch - it looks absolutely fine to me. I didn't buy it at first because of the VC, but had no problems at all getting it as soon as that was fixed and have been using it ever since.Ian P.

While they did make it better after the patch, it still lacks a believable look when flying in the VC (cartoonish textures, same as the beech VC), unlike the Carenado products, granted new textures might help, but the last few offerings from carenado have been top notch and a beaver would be an amazing offering if done to this quality.Regards, MichaelKDFWhttp://www.calvirair.com/mcpics/mcdcvabanner.jpgCalVirAir International

I'd love to see Carenado make a P-210. A Lancair IV-P would be nice, but there's just something about the way Carenado handles analog gauge cockpits that would make me think of a P-210 from them as being a treat.-John

>While they did make it better after the patch, it still lacks>a believable look when flying in the VC (cartoonish textures,>same as the beech VC),Obviously, I disagree.>unlike the Carenado products, granted>new textures might help, but the last few offerings from>carenado have been top notch and a beaver would be an amazing>offering if done to this quality.Knowing Carenado, they'd release a wheeled version by itself, then add float, ski and tundra models in seperate packages every couple months and charge you for all of 'em so the whole shebang will cost at least 50% more than the Aerosoft package when you'r finally through, then they'd refuse to answer any customer e-mails and hose the repainters with mystifying texture mod policies. :( :-roll(I like Carenado's planes. I like them a lot. They just make it very hard to like them as a company sometimes.)