>A question I've asked before (without answer) is how can FSD>be so sure of what's happened on its customers' computers?It obviously can

>After the conversations with Tim the last days, I am>transforming from complainer too fan, he really is working>hard to solve this! Seems like he's almost there, and>hopefully all who have had problems will benefit from it :).But this only confirms that all those problems we have heard so much about were not the "fault" of FSD

"Others do find them useful...I get feedback to that effect OFTEN."Amen to that, even if we disagree at times!Hope this helps,Jimhttp://www.hifisim.com/Active Sky V6 Development TeamActive Sky V6 Proud SupporterHiFi Beta TeamRadar Contact Supporter

Everybody in the software business has isolated problems. Any objective person realizes that. This drive-by cheap shot is why I no longer take any of your remarks as credible, as is likely the case with some of the other readers.The fact that they are working hard to resolve the guy's problem speaks volumes to me. I contacted McAfee on a support issue a week ago and have yet to get an answer other than the usual automated reply. That, unfortunately, has become pretty typical these days. Here the folks are trying to help the guy and all you want to do is launch one cheap shot after another.Why can't you try and be objective? Or if you have some kind of real complaint with them just quite hiding behind these cheap shots and say what it is? Or do you have any actual experience with the company at all?

Then you obviously don't visit there too often, or you are not paying attention. These things are openly discussed from time to time, where such a discussion on simflight.com, flightsim.com or here would get the boot.The operator may not be sympathetic to them, but does not seem to control what goes on there. Like it's some kind of graffiti wall. Reasonable and objective people don

>Everybody in the software business has isolated problems.I would not call this an "isolated problem"!> Any>objective person realizes that. This drive-by cheap shot is>why I no longer take any of your remarks as credible, as is>likely the case with some of the other readers.Everybody has to decide for himself what he considers to be credible or not...I have no problem here as I really don

>Then you obviously don't visit there too often, or you are>not paying attention. These things are openly discussed from>time to time, where such a discussion on simflight.com,>flightsim.com or here would get the boot.>>The operator may not be sympathetic to them, but does not seem>to control what goes on there. Like it's some kind of>graffiti wall. Reasonable and objective people don

This thread has run its course. Locked.