but I think I will wait for addons to be patched to FSX standards. I am just not a fan at all of the default aircraft.

hadn't you heard that no existing addons will ever work with FSX?It's been all over the internet for months now from people who can know, like 10 year old kids who've met someone who once was in Seattle 20 years ago.

>hadn't you heard that no existing addons will ever work with>FSX?So those companies that are offering an upgrade to an exisiting product for FSX, are full of it?

Was that to offend MS? I know that the payware aircraft is the way for many folks But to even expect the default aircrafts to be like a pay ware is .... silly IMO? Were you really expecting it to be as good as a $40 payware aircraft and you are disappointed that its not and that we are to empathise with you for your disappointment? :) Really!... I mean Come on! Manny

>>hadn't you heard that no existing addons will ever work>with>>FSX?>>So those companies that are offering an upgrade to an>exisiting product for FSX, are full of it?Don't you know sarcasm when you hear it? [/Charlie Brown]

Personally, I think the Beaver is amazing. Very nicely done, as is the Ultralight and the CRJ. The Baron is the only one thats kinda iffy.. ie, no pilot in external model, old default gauges and panel from FS9.

no I would just like a simple airplane to fly basically like an airplane. its the flight dynamics that I think are horrible.

No offense, but let me say something offensive. He, he. You guys crack me up! :)

one guy was on here and he said that the default airbus was better than a payware addon aircraft,nuts! lol

>Personally, I think the Beaver is amazing. Very nicely done,>as is the Ultralight and the CRJ. The Baron is the only one>thats kinda iffy.. ie, no pilot in external model, old default>gauges and panel from FS9.I haven't gotten a chance to fly the Beaver yet, but I am really falling in love with that Ultralight. It's such a pleasant serene vehicle to fly in.