msfs Fenix A320 playing out well

[earthdog 842]

Well the new update of the Fenix A320 with the combination of me disabling Photogrammetry gave me the breathing room i needed to enjoy it to the fullest.

[Michael Moe 496]

Great visually images. What is missing without PG? Must be quite a bit? Maybe you fly were its not needed? Performance increase %?

Thanks Michael Moe 

[pmplayer 9,574]

Superb shots !

cheers 😉

[earthdog 842]

54 minutes ago, Michael Moe said:

Great visually images. What is missing without PG? Must be quite a bit? Maybe you fly were its not needed? Performance increase %?

Thanks Michael Moe 

For me nothing is missing. Just the buildings are not "close to their real counterparts" and they are more generic buildings, but they are not missing. MSFS without Photogrammetry is like running our old sims with Photoreal everywhere and buildings autogen. I fly airliners more than VFR but i do not feel that i am missing anything.

Now the photogrammetry that affects performance in MSFS "seems" to come from the photogrammetry that is added from World Updates and not all photogrammetry.

Deleting the photogrammetry from the World Updates and leaving photogrammetry ON from General->Data option improves the performance as it would when you disable Photogrammetry all together. This suggests that something is wrong with World Update PG.

BUT after so many years i am getting too old to spent my time adjusting FS, i disabled all PG and i am a happy man.

Metrics:

PG ON, FENIX A320, KBOS payware: FPS 24

PG ON, PG World Update deleted, FENIX A320, KBOS payware: FPS 41

PG OFF, PG World Update deleted, , FENIX A320, KBOS payware: FPS 41

I can now maintain 30 Locked FPS anywhere with VATSIM heavy traffic.

[johnbow72 2,722]

Outstanding shots Sir !! . 

[P_7878 6,711]

Truly beautiful set.... some of these are poster material....🙂....(have fun with your new bus...)...!