Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
zachlog

Managing Takeoffs Fenix A320 CFM vs. IAE Engines

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure about the EFB calculations, but from a real world aircraft performance stand point, I will say this. Aircraft takeoff performance and configurations follow a curve so to speak. There are two items that will impact this. Runway available and required climb gradients. These two items may drive where you will fall in that curve. Some manufacturers allow you to take full advantage of the curve and some allow you to take certain sections of the curve. For example, the DC10 and G550 that I have experience with. The DC10 took full advantage of the curve allowing 200 flap configurations from 5 to 25. The compromise between runway available/conditions and climb gradients will lead to the optimum flap setting/max weight for that takeoff. In the G550, you only have 10 and 20 for takeoff. You get two stabs at the curve, but that jet can takeoff at max weight on 5000FT of dry runway, so do you need the full optimized solution? no. 10 for high climb requirements and 20 for short runways. 

On the typical curve, the front end usually gives you good climb performance because of less flap drag, but may limit weight capability. The middle of the curve will give you a good compromise of climb and weight capability if it's possible. The aft end of the curve will get you off the runway quicker with all of the flaps, but again, may limit your weight and hurt your climb because of the drag.

Now, in regard to the Airbus, flaps 1, 2 and 3 fall on the curve and will be based on conditions in an optimized solution. What I'm saying is that flaps 3 should not "kill" you or cause issues because it's on the performance curve. With flaps 3, the calculated Vr, Vmu and V2 should work. Yes, you will have more drag and less climb capability than 1 or 2 for a given weight and power setting. But, the aircraft won't fall out of the sky and get into stick shaker because of flap 3. Flaps 1, 2 and 3 should all have the same percentage of Vstall, which creates the curve.    

  • Like 4
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've received a few flap three recommendations and for me as long as i am carefully following the flight director in this very critical phase and not blowing past it pulling back on the stick looking for 757 performance the aircraft flies as it should.  You will lose airspeed and drop into into a prot mode if you ignore the recommended climb profile trying to gain altitude or retract flaps too early. the airspeed will increase to the flap retraction speeds and move right on up to the clean wing configuration as long as you accept and fly the guidance given as shown in the video @Aamir just posted.

Another factor is the weight. Simbrief seems to like to make sure almost all seats are filled each flight. So i suspect its not the engines being weak but the high drag of the flap selection and your packed to the gills flight resulting in sluggish initial phase climb performance.

  • Like 3

AMD Ryzen 5900X / Asus Strix B550 F Gaming Wifi / Powercolor AMD 6800XT Red Devil / 32GB Gskill Trident Neo DDR4 3600 / 2x ADATA XPG 8200pro NVME / Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 / EVGA Supernova 750 GT PSU / Lian Li Lancool II Mesh Performance /

Asus VG34VQL3A / Schiit Bifrost DAC+ Schiit Asgard AMP /  Sennheiser HD 558 / Thrustmaster T.16000M + TFRP Rudders

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Maxis said:

I've received a few flap three recommendations and for me as long as i am carefully following the flight director in this very critical phase and not blowing past it pulling back on the stick looking for 757 performance the aircraft flies as it should.  You will lose airspeed and drop into into a prot mode if you ignore the recommended climb profile trying to gain altitude or retract flaps too early. the airspeed will increase to the flap retraction speeds and move right on up to the clean wing configuration as long as you accept and fly the guidance given as shown in the video @Aamir just posted.

Another factor is the weight. Simbrief seems to like to make sure almost all seats are filled each flight. So i suspect its not the engines being weak but the high drag of the flap selection and your packed to the gills flight resulting in sluggish initial phase climb performance.

I've done two config 3 takeoffs on the IAEs and each time I was only able to pass the ILS antennas by only 5 feet, and this only by pulling full up at the last second. Almost like this (except for the fact that I did not take the wrong intersection...): https://www.tiktok.com/@drtruuth/video/7339396335054916906

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Maxis said:

I've received a few flap three recommendations and for me as long as i am carefully following the flight director in this very critical phase and not blowing past it pulling back on the stick looking for 757 performance the aircraft flies as it should.  You will lose airspeed and drop into into a prot mode if you ignore the recommended climb profile trying to gain altitude or retract flaps too early. the airspeed will increase to the flap retraction speeds and move right on up to the clean wing configuration as long as you accept and fly the guidance given as shown in the video @Aamir just posted.

Well said, and a very instructional video, emphasizing the importance of carefully following the SRS. 

BBjBizN.jpeg

Edited by Cpt_Piett
  • Upvote 1

i9-12900KF @ 5.1GHz | MSI Trio Gaming X RTX4090 | MSI MPG Z690 Carbon EK X | G.Skill Trident Z5 32GB DDR5 | WD Black SN850 2TB SSD | Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB SSD | 2x Samsung 960 EVO 500GB SSDs | Hela 850R Platinum PCIe 5.0 w/ 12VHPWR cable | Corsair RM750X | LG 77" OLED 3840x2160 | Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog | MFG Crosswind pedals | Thrustmaster TCA Captain Pack X Airbus Edition

“Intensify the forward batteries. I don’t want anything to get through”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fiorentoni said:

I've done two config 3 takeoffs on the IAEs and each time I was only able to pass the ILS antennas by only 5 feet, and this only by pulling full up at the last second. Almost like this (except for the fact that I did not take the wrong intersection...)

This, when flying per the procedures, leads me to believe that there may be some issues in performance calculations for flaps 3. As I mentioned in an earlier post, aircraft performance will follow a curve in regard to flap settings. Another part of the curve that I didn't mention is the accel go portion of certification requirements. There is part for accel stop too😝. For example, FAA certified aircraft will be at 35FT at the end of the accel go distance. All depends on the certification requirements. What this means is that regardless of the flap setting used, the aircraft has to meet no less than that requirement ENGINE OUT. Now in a sense, for the same weight, flaps 3 should easily meet that requirement because more flaps get you off the ground quicker/easier. But regardless, if a higher weight is calculated for flaps 3, it still has to be no less than certified height by the end of it's respective accel go/balanced field length engine out.

Based on my experience, if I am rotating in the last 500FT and I am not engine out, something is wrong. You do have the responsibility of ensuring you are not runway limited for a specific weight, but I'm unsure of what the EFB is doing in the back ground. At least in the real world, you are comparing runway limiting weight wet/dry and climb requirement weight to calculate the optimum/max weight. If your actual weight is less than those, you can flex to a point. These days, computers will spit that out in seconds once the conditions are entered.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently stopped flying the Fenix, but when I was flying it with the IAE engines, I noticed that the aircraft seemed to use a great deal of runway, much more than the 737 usually does on the same runways, with about the same weight load. I always use Flaps 1, and usually runway in the 8,000 + ft range. Just seemed a bit underpowered. 


 

BOBSK8             MSFS 2020 ,    ,PMDG 737-600-800 FSLTL , TrackIR ,  Avliasoft EFB2  ,  ATC  by PF3  ,

A Pilots LIfe V2 ,  CLX PC , Auto FPS, ACTIVE Sky FS,  PMDG DC6 , A2A Comanche, Fenix A320, Milviz C 310

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, G550flyer said:

Based on my experience, if I am rotating in the last 500FT and I am not engine out, something is wrong.

I think the Vr was alright, it was at a plausible point on the runway. The problem appears after rotating: It just won't climb for a couple of seconds. Maybe it's a too high flex number calculated or an issue with drag, I don't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Fiorentoni said:

I think the Vr was alright, it was at a plausible point on the runway. The problem appears after rotating: It just won't climb for a couple of seconds. Maybe it's a too high flex number calculated or an issue with drag, I don't know.

Reminds me of flexing in the Gulfstream. Before you flex, you better make sure you are still making the min climb gradients and not exceeding runway available lol. Run your scenario again and see what it does at full rated takeoff thrust. Take notes on lift off point and climb rate after lift off. This is interesting.

Edited by G550flyer
Forgot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...