Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Steve Hess

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I found hiw to make it work with and without Ultimate Terrain X running. I moved the KPSM_ADE_SCH_CVX.bgl from the \Addon Scenery\scenery folder to the \Addon Scenery\Pease AFB folder and all is good.
  2. I found the problem. My Ultimate Terrain X was over riding the polygons. On a hunch I disabled it and they showed up. I guess I will modify the scenery for everyone but me. :lol: Thank you for your input Steve
  3. Yes both files are there, but the polygon I added is not
  4. Thank you for the reply I built my airport scenery on top of the Stock KPSM airport. Is there a way to view the airport polygon so I can modify it
  5. I am trying to modify my Pease AFB scenery using ADE. I add a Land Class polygon near the end of the runway for a Golf Course, but it never shows up in FSX I want to add more polygons, but I need to get past the first one Thanks Steve
  6. I have been working on a project for well over a year. I was working with a very talented gauge programer who was doing amazing work. For an unknown reason two months ago I lost all contact with him (I hope he is okay). I could release the aircraft as it is, but would very much like to finish up some things before I do. I could use a really talented and experienced gauge programer to help with this project. My previous programer will be very, very hard to replace, he was a genius and created things for this aircraft that has never been done in FSX before. If you feel you would like to take on this challenge and have the skills to push the limits of FSX, please contact me for more details. Thank you
  7. I saw the new video. I like the spinning turbine blades.
  8. I am glad to help. It's looking good. I look forward to it.
  9. I just saw the newest pictures of the Just Flight F-111. It is looking better and better
  10. Try this free alternative to TrackIR. If you have a webcam you already have all the hardware you need, no modification to the camera needed. http://facetracknoir.sourceforge.net/home/default.htm
  11. This one is in Beta testing. Looks good http://www.f111-fsx.com/
  12. The FSX,COM F-111 looks good, but it still leaves me wanting much more.It looks and works well, but they just focused on the pilot seat. There is so much more that could have be done. Model-wise my F-111 uses the Alphasim freeware F-111 (the model is just OK at best), but is the most fun to fly with the only TRUE LOOK AHEAD PITCH AND ROLL STABILIZED TERRAIN FOLLOWING RADAR system. That is the heart and soul of the F-111 flying experience. For more details click this link. https://sites.google...Version-History We are working to hard give the most realistic F-111 flying experience possible. That includes more than just a great model, we certainly don’t have one. I have the greatest respect for the people who model aircraft. I wish I had those skills. To me a bad F-111 is better than no F-111. None of the F-111s (Virtavia, FSX.com, and Just Flight) are bad. I have a very high standard having first hand knowledge of the F-111, being a former F-111 avionics systems specialist. When I say ‘worst than’ I should explain that while an 8 is worst than a 9, an 8 is still pretty good. Will I buy the Just Flight F-111, you bet I will? Will it be good? I am sure it will. I hope the beta testers report the pylon issue, or maybe someone from Just Flight will catch this post and fix it. Either way it looks good and I can’t wait to fly it. I would love to beta test it too. My F-111 project
  13. Having worked on the F-111 for four years I may be more critical than most people, but if you are going to model an aircraft do some simple research and get it right. I realize that it is still not finished, but the overall look of the textures just look 'cheesy'. The outer pylons on their model rotate as the wings sweep, but they are really fixed and do not move limiting the wing-sweep to 26 degrees when install. The VC looks good, but I will have to see how well it works. To be honest I am so disappointed with the Virtavia FSX F-111 it has made me skeptical and more cirtiacal of Justflight's F-111 and if you can't get some simple details correct, like the pylons, it makes me doubt what I can't see yet. I could forgive a lot from a freeware aircraft, but if you want people to buy your product then you better show you did some research! Virtavia's F-111 VC's look good at first glance. After flying it for a few minutes you quickly realize that the camera views are awkward and it functions poorly. You can read my review of the Virtavia F-111 here. http://stevesflights...yware-f-111#102 The FSX.com F-111 looks good. I am beta tesing it now.
  14. From what i can see, it looks wordt than the Virtavia F-111

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.