1kris007

You're probably using FSINN's weather

Purchased it a few weeks ago, but i've been spending the time to learn the manuals and to play around with the systems on the ground. PMDG has made an AMAZINGLY breathtaking product! Well worth my money, i don't regret the investment at all I was so blown away that i'm getting my computer upgraded! Hopefully i'll get it back tomorrow so that I can do my first flight (KTBO - KORL) w/ the 737-800SFP Needless to say, the anxiety is killing me

That only says FS2004 though :(Are you sure that it will work with X? Thank you!!!

Hello everyone! Been trying to figure out how to make the default 172 perform a little better for the fun of it.I've tried editing max_rated_hp, but i didn't see much difference! Thought that this was the best place to come to get some advice. Thank you in advance.

Is your refresh rate the same for the HGS and the ND?

I think i'm going to take a chance and just buy it tomorrow. I'll never know what i'm going to get until i see it for myself. Hoping for the best, who knows it may work out great :) I run the -400X perfectly with no problems so i'm hoping for the same with the NGX. A little nervous though, but excited none-the-less! Had my first few flights planned out months agoThanks for the help everyone, i'll let you guys know how it works out.

VNAV will not descend below the altitude in the MCP window. In your case it is 4,500, once it gets to that altitude it will level off. If you had 6,000 it would level off there. Set your MCP to the field elevation and then it will descend passed 4,500 feet. hope i was able to help.

Those aren't that common though. At least not in a modern jet with a FADEC.

what do you mean?

I'm really worried now about whether or not my computer can handle the NGX smoothlyIt handles the -400X extremely smoothly, but I am concerned none the less.

Thanks! On the ground with medium traffic and in the VC with the HUGS down would be good. Hoping for positive results!

So it's kind of dependent on individual cases? Some people reporting more, some reporting less.I hope that I can report getting more when i load up the NGX! haha.

Thank you guys, I appreciate it! Anyone else willing to report their results? :)

I m going to purchase the NGX this weekend, and I was just wondering if someone that also owns the 747-400X could comment on how the frame rates compare between the two products? Just trying o figure out what to expect. With the -400X I get about 25-60 frames per second depending on the airport, and 10 frames at worst, so I would be delighted if the 737NGX performed even better!

"Mach tuck is an aerodynamic effect, whereby the nose of an aircraft tends to pitch downwards as the airflow around the wing reaches supersonic speeds." —Wikipedia But the actual work 'tuck' means, push, fold, or turn