Jump to content

ohsirus

Members
  • Content Count

    3,028
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

241 Excellent

About ohsirus

  • Rank
    Member - 3,000+

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    Other
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Well if it was like the upgrade path, pretty sure they didn't send a email letting users know.
  2. Still upset at that shoddy upgrade path for previous owners.
  3. Crystal is not for everyone, it's heavy, cumbersome, sometimes buggy, it has better clarity, but not edge to edge to clarity. The Quest 3/Pro really needs a strong PC to shine. My opinion is the Aero, Crystal, and Quest 3 all would be grouped as current Gen Headsets and the opinion of going from one to the other will depend on the person and usage. Also there is no VR program to really break out and show a big difference in capabilities. It's still MSFS graphics rendered in VR.
  4. Sounds like you are rendering beyond your PC's capability. What Video Card are you running?
  5. I get 45+ FPS in my PMDG 737 on KSFO runway. Take off I range in the 40+ fps, smooth no stutter. Airborne 45+ fps.
  6. Crystal is not sharp once you leave it's sweet spot. It's also a bear to to keep it balanced to enjoy it. Everyone seems to acknowledge the G2 has a tiny sweet spot and I personally can't see how that is enjoyable in a sim. The Quest 3 has so many hardware/software variables and it seems we sometimes end up on two extremes of visuals & performance. I feel mine is running near native and close to the visuals I had in my Crystal's sweet spot as far as legible text and rendering distance. I do have a beefy system though.
  7. Quest/Pico/Vive BETA version 1.29.3 - Release Notes @everyone To install this beta version, navigate to the store page of Virtual Desktop on the Meta website (https://www.meta.com/experiences/2017050365004772/) or phone app. Scroll down to the version number, click it and select the BETA channel. You will also need to manually install the Beta Streamer from here: https://download.vrdesktop.net/files/beta/VirtualDesktop.Streamer.Setup.exe • Improved AV1 performance with AMD • Improved SSW quality on Quest • Added custom OpenXR runtime called VDXR on the PC side providing up to 10% improved performance • Added OpenXR runtime selection box in the Streamer window (Automatic, SteamVR or VDXR) • Added Exit Game button in the Virtual Desktop menu for non-SteamVR games • Removed regular AV1 codec option (only AV1 10-bit now available) • Fixed compatibility with many games on the Rift store: Pistol Whip, Onward, Population: One, Zenith, etc. • Fixed issues with audio device restoration and monitor resolution change when shutting down/restarting computer in VR • Fixed incorrect 5 GHz / 7 GHz appearing in computers tab / performance overlay when using 6 GHz band • Fixed Head Lock feature to work when moving around your play space • Fixed field of view edges on Quest 3 For Pico/Vive users, you can install this Beta by installing the APK from the GitHub page here: https://github.com/guygodin/VirtualDesktop/releases/tag/v1.29.3
  8. Yeah, I agree. Using software rendering allows a wider range of visuals when compared to DP and then HMD experiences. I put my Quest 3's visuals above the Quest Pro and near enough to the Pimax Crystal to not justify the price difference. Since I wear my HMD sloppily around my head, Pancake lenses are all I look for now.
  9. I don't have a G2 to compare, but have you tried adjusting the distortion curvature in the Oculus Debug tool? If you have a Nvidia Card you can set trilinear optimization to off for a little more sharpening. I use VD as I can't gt Oculus to look or perform well on link anymore. Probably need to wipe it and reload.
  10. Weird, as most people have said that it looks better than the Reverb G2, VR Flight Sim Guy mentioned it in his video. With your 4090 you should not be using DLSS and with TAA you should be pushing 45+ FPS. I set mine to 1.5 and 90 HZ, no ASW, and Textures to Ultra. Even when I ran it cabled it had a awesome/clear picture, but VD raises it to near native IMO.
  11. Are you running your Q3 through Virtual Desktop and if so have you checked SteamVRs Video setting to make sure it is set for 100% I'm confused as most of my readings have the Quest Pro over the G2 and like I said the Q3 is a step up from the Pro. I have a awesome VR flight environment that to me rivals my Crystal with edge to edge clarity.
  12. Yeah, the Youtube videos are what made me jump for the Crystal. Definitely experience it and decide for yourself. I wish I had a G2 to see for myself. I read a number of people who got the QPro when it launched saying it was a step up in clarity form the G2 and the Q3 is a bump up from the Qpro. I will say settings are everything in this case. Oculus Link is trash. Virtual Desktop is needed, since you have a 4090 you can run AV1 10-bit and god mode. I hope you are not using DLSS, but TAA and your resolution in-sim should be minimal 35XX x 36XX, I get 45+ fps in VR with these settings and once openxr for VD is released I'm back at smooth 50 fps which is what I had with my Crystal.
×
×
  • Create New...