Attilio

Is the older EI-DAC no longer? Is the lease finished?

Is there a gauge that indicates the magnetic declination?

Is it possible to change the lights of the 2d panel?

Yes, In the past it worked

I did some research. The 737 has a temporary database. In navdata just write a waypoint name not already present in the database and then enter the coordinates. All temporary points will be listed on the summary page. Apparently this is not simulated

https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/521615-custom-waypoints-b777-vs-b737-fmc.html

Will the 737 ng3 also be for X-PLANE? I'm still with FSX. Very soon I would like to switch to 64 bit.

For example in a320 there is the possibility to create additional waypoints that end up in a temporary database. Is there any chance on the 737?

Yes I read FCOM 1 and 2. I know how to insert waypoint with coordinates. I want to insert waypoint in NAVDATA database out of my route.

Ok, I will try to use the vc. You can recommend a program similar to ezdok camera but free. If I like vc then I will also buy ezdok camera (or chase plain)

Ok, but if I want to add new waypoint in database with coordinates? Is it possible?

I have also reported it. Yesterday I was told that for now there are no updates to the ngx. But is this correction expected? Also because before it worked perfectly

Flying in areas with famous mountains (St Helen, Everest, K2 ....) I would like to see the point on my ND. So I should add a waypoint on the NAVDATA with certain coordinates and then insert this waypoint on the fix page. How can I do?

Scenery complex is set to max. Autogen density is set to min

Yes. I have the same problem with the second one scenery in the library. This is the link https://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?DLID=177062

There isn't duplicate afcad. I don't use My traffic, Orbx ecc..... My fsx is clean. I change only the default texture with those: https://www.google.it/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=%23&ved=0ahUKEwi-5ITXmJbZAhWQCuwKHZGNDS4QwqsBCCowAA&usg=AOvVaw0VTJzWxrN8ZFOD4xbU2nov

No problem. Thank you for your interest. Now I noticed another problem : my runway floats. I begin to think that there is something wrong with my FSX.

New test I took off from EKVG, flew around the islands and returned to EKVG. I have the same VAS value but now there isn't any problem. TAKE OFF LANDING

I try again but nothing change. The VAS is good!

I downloaded the beautiful Faroe Islands scenery from http://webryan.dk/. If I do many toch and go circuit there isn't any problem bat if my flight start from another airport( for example EGPH,EKCH ecc) I have this problem:

I'm not interested in the graphics, in fact my FSX is clean. I only update the afcads. I use active sky next, pmdg 737 ngx, concorde fslabs e a320 fslabs, but only with 2d. I am interested only in the normal and abnormal procedures, this and everything. In 2d everything is more accessible and accessible, such as overhead and I'm not comfortable with VC. I thank you for your opinions, but I tried dozens of times to use the VC but it did not go, even with the help of programs like ezca and chase plane. I would like the 777 but I do not buy it because I would not use it because of the lack of 2D

Exactly why I did not take 777 and 747. I am very disappointed but I can not use the VC. For more people 2D is useless, for me it is essential.

You are very kind. The problem with VC is that I do not want to have gauges in perspective and above all smaller ones respect to 2D. I hope PMDG does not continue this anti-2D policy

Main and overhead panel like ngx?

Soon I will have to upgrade to P3D v4 after years on FSX The 737-800 ngx is absolutely my favorite aircraft and also has the 2D panel. Because of the lack of 2D I could not take the fantastic 777 and 747. Now that you have announced the NG3 I would like to know whether to continue a bit more with the ngx on FSX and then to pass on P3D with the new NG3. But the NG3 (I hope it's the MAX) will have the 2D? Unfortunately with the VC I just can not fly despite active camera.