cagrikartal

This is why in the sim we get the FBW in blue in the pfd to compansate the backforce of yoke as most of us dont have a motorised joystick or yoke. Now, tell me i dont deserve a free 747v3 copy !!!

hmm how about -8 ?I heard it has new fency stuf on it like fbw etc....

hello everyone, Do you think 747 has a trimming logic closer to the 777 or the 737 ? or Neither ?

Hmm thanks for the correction. But wouldnt it be confuising to have fd directing otherways while you go direct via visual after minimum ?

6 superjumbos a day ? i dont even see that much a380 in the air in here LFBO Its not a high precision approach like an ils or something once you have visual and/or crossed the minima fds not necessary. otherwise you can keep them on as you feel

Hello folks, I cant wait to do this with the 747v3, For now enjoy the t7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvNjGr0VvOw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4eRlwOgbZM

hmm i get it, but i would also like to mention that when i use pfpx,AS2016 and topcat to plan my flights i get values that doesnt match with the values i get when i enter the numbers in pmdg 777lr, For example i have topcat saying TO1 +54 resulting 87%N1 on fmc TO1 +54 gives 95%N1.(i compensate it by changing the assumed temperature) Having a pmdg calculator would eliminate the accuracy differences between other products.(i remember reading in t7 update topic that they ve changed the assumed takeoff algorithms to have more realistic result) However i cant say how much it cost in time or money but given the complexity and the price range of the product i say it is worth it.

yes but i dont know maybe engine modeling accuracy is diffrerent or something else. i havent flown much on the v2 so :Big Grin: and '' yes you can" would take u less time, unles u have a lot of time to kill :t1851:

hello everyone, I was wondering will we be able to use the 747v2 profile in topcat for the v3 performance ? if not, i would love to have some sort of performance calculator from pmdg which may be compatible with other softwares like pfpx. As far as i know we still don't have a profile for 773 in topcat(i heard they stopped development and the ones left on the market arent auite accurate) and it is very easy to overpower on takeoffs with those ge90s. And since we have different(and accurate) engine options on v3, i thought it would be nice to be able to see the differences on the flightplans otherwise what is the point of the accuracy ? what do you think ? thank you and a happy new year to everyone

I already have it but its not accurate enough but as you said its the only solution for now.

good idea i would like that.... and also maybe a performance calculator as topcat stopped developing and its very easy with the 773 to make an over/under powered takeoff...

hi u can check the avsim libary. its already done http://library.avsim.net/search.php?CatID=fsx&SearchTerm=pmdg&Sort=Added&ScanMode=0&Go=Change+View

thank you sean, i tried it and it seems gone.

hi folks I have fog in my cockpit, has anyone suffered this problem ? specs, win7 (recently clean installed) PMDG 777 REX ESSANTIAL PLUS ASN MAXED OUT GRAPHIC SETTINGS WITH DX10 ENABLED here is what it looks like: Thanks

I just tride it egkk 26l. I think it works that way. The airport elev on the fmc was 203 and i got the 1000 callout at 1200 msl (960agl).

Thank you both for helping out. just to make sure if i got it right; if the airport elevation is lets say 800ft above sea level you will hear the 1000 callout around 1800 ft msl.Right ?

but is it the same for a 737 ? because in the same conditions the ngx's 1000ft alert comes exactly at 1000ft.

Hi folks I don't know if this has been discused here before (i ve made a search and found nothing) but here is a strange problem i ve been having since the latest updates of the t7. The problem is, i m getting the 1000 callout when my radio altimeters says i'm about 1200 feet above ground some times even higher. i have a clean fsx without much addons excepts the ones that bring the reality to it like pfpx or asn or topcat etc. So no global scenery what so ever. (a few free airports but the problem is happening even when flying to default airports ) I have other callouts working fine only the 1000ft alert and it only heppens with the 777-300er/200lr Not with the ngx. Anyone having this problem ? Thank you

Thats why i ve written ''minor turbulances'' which aircraft's auto thrust system can easily overcome, but you are right in some cases pilots must interfier with thrust levers to get a quicker response. thank you for your suggestions, I'll check those settings tonight to see if it changes anything

Thanks for your replay... maybe its time to move onto p3d. maybe fsx is not good enough for such a system complexty etc... i have one last question left if you dont mind. Is there anyone suffered from this problem in p3d or in other words, what kind of problems are resolved in p3d that fsx wasnt able to offer any solution ?

hi folks i have discused this many many time in this forum. I reinstalled every thing ( inculidin complete reinstallation of windows) a few weeks ago. But the problem seems to be back again, What happens is when flying the final approach if the weather is a little turbulant (relatively minor turbulances ) the auto thrust does not responde quickly to speed changes and the speed drops down to yellow bar which disables the autoland. what is more interesting is that even after that auto trust does nothing to get out of yellow bar. The last time i had this problem i resolved it by reinstalling the ASN without service pack then it seemed to be gone. I thing there is something wrong about handling when using the asn.

Do you use Active Sky Next ? if yes, try to fly with default weather but set the same crosswind and see if it happens again. i am getting stanges behaviors from t7 since the release of the sp1-B for asn... hope this helps

maybe you are right, but it ld add more realism to recive the aircraft. Im kinda as real as it gets guy in terms of Aircraft systems (in the limits of a deskop simulation off corse ^_^) it's not a must have thing but i just wanted to share and i too think that they are way too busy on new projects and platforms

hi folks While i was preparing the cockpit for a trip at gate ( i use the long cockpit state for startup ) i tought it would be cool to have a rondom Turn arround state ( which will set some swiches in unproper positions rondomly everytime we load the a/c ) in order to increase the chance to spot some misconfigured swiches during flow checks. As the default states are fixed, we know that there is not going to be any suprise. i ve also tought that i could save the state after flights but that would be too much saved states, which may increase the chance of getting issues related to panel states. what do you think ?

i have exported wind and route it came to tel me route or wind is ready to load, i ve loaded them then it didn't go. it went out at somewhere in midway enroute. But Thanks for the explenation