DrzewieckiDesign

Hi. Please just create a new accout.

Personally I do not care about GSX but many of our customers asked for a similar solution as there was for FSX/P3D and Cartayna did 100+ commercial-grade configs for them. You should also note, that you can create your own scenery for free using the Developer Mode in MSFS. You do not have to buy them at all. Same with GSX profiles I guess. I recommend Cartayna because I know how they do the profiles, what source information they use for that and how those profiles integrate with our airports. This is a tested solution, but that does not mean the only available. Same with sceneries - you have very nice freewares too or you can make your own. I am not sure why this generates such an emotional reaction in your case. (edit) I totally agree about „useless stuff” but this is not one of those in my oinion. ☺️

Hey. That product is not out yet so you can’t really know what will that product include. But by all means, it is not required. You can use KEWR without GSX perfectly fine or use a free profile if someone makes it at some point. Oh, it is not „lame”, they actually do that very well - and with all realistic pushbacks and guidance systems configured that is quite a lot of work per airport. Anyway - the compatibility with something is a feature not a con. 😅

It is even trickier in the real life but just as fun! 😄 Watch out for power lines when coming from the East.

Guys, I've made an installer for this package - hope this helps with any install issues. The installer will automatically remove the previous version. Warsaw Free Airfields (104MB) Sorry for not making this sooner🙂

I agree.

DEL I haven't realised that the topic was so old.

Thank you. I am very glad you like it. This file , when put to X-Plane 10\Custom Scenery\EETN_Tallinn_XP_high\Earth nav data\+50+020, should enable static aircraft back, together with HDR lights. If possible, please let me know if it works fine for you. If it does, I will publish a v1.1 update of the whole installer. Best regards Stanislaw

Hello guys. Thank you for noticing our product! We have started from a product less complex than some of our largest releases, simply to test the XP technology, the designing / converting techniques and the market. We had to create quite a few new things, like a completely new installing system, that supports for example automatic editing of XP navaids. XP sales are not equal to current FS2004 sales yet (although it is a bestselling XP product this week :huh: ), but this platform has an obvious potential. I personally hope that XP customers will like this product, which would certainly encourage us to concentrate more on XP market. By the way, the product seems to be a really nice destination, with Baltic Sea nearby, Ulemiste lake and the whole Tallinn city downtown on final approach, with many landmarks and VFR points visible, not mentioning a very detailed autogen and large area of ground textures. The airport itself isn't that big (2 mln pax annually) but it is a really nice place, with a Scandinavian touch (the new terminal reminds me a Scandinavian architecture). I personally like the real life EETN very much - it is a tiny (well, in comparison), clean, quiet and friendly place. We have tried to recreate that feeling in the artificial flight simulation world. I hope that buyers of EETN Tallinn XP are/will be satisfied with their purchase. Stanislaw

I guess this is the only company on the market with such a support system than. But please take into consideration that when there are no bugs there is almost no support work required (maybe sometimes to seniors with helping to make an online purchase). As a customer I would simply go for a money return and post an appropriate comment at the store - now when I know the problem from the both sides. Good support is (or should be) a part of a good product in my opinion.

If the customer sais the truth, it would be a shame for any developer to have his customers support treating customers in a such unprofessional way. If the customer made up this story, which will be quite bad for the already bad AirSimmer's PR, this case should be solved asap anyway in my opinion.