danhenri

The Phenom is one of my best add-on. Indeed, there is a learning curve to know how to properly adjust the temp in the cabin, but once you get it, passengers are staying quiet ! Don't forget also to switch off the AC fan before start and to clean up the cabin before boarding... What I like the most : without autothrottle, flying this beast is very challenging.

Back to Bill A's question at the beginning of this thread. I suggest to use an AI like ChatGpt to identify the best settings according to your config : not only the GPU, CPU and so on, but also your screen (very important). You will be surprised how precise the results will be. Since then, I entcounter stutters at arrival in only few circomstances (old payware sceneries most of the time). Then, that's up to you to proceed to some adjustments. In my case, for example, AI suggested to set MSFS texture resolution on ULTRA : HIGH is sufficient for me and I've got best performance when running airliners.

Did not see any interest. If you want to control, go to VATSIM or IVAO...

Hello, I don't share the same bad experience as you. Today, I flew from LFBH (La Rochelle) to LOWI. Innsbruck has a very complicated approach and the weather was horrible. BATC gave me a vectoring approach for the R-NAV Z rwy 26. And it did it very well ! I have the basic implementation, not the experimental one. You have often to manage your path of descent yourself, as when you are flying on virtual networks (IVAO in my case). When BATC is asking you if you are ready to descent, just answer "will call when ready". Then, you may follow your VNAV path and call back BATC when you are ready for descent. Check your altitude and if you are too high, ask BATC for an altitude change. I did it, and it did work. Sure, sometimes BATC fails, but not as often as some people are reporting here. Just my two cents.

PMDG 737-800

Where assign the "repair" function" of the G3000 please ? Disregard : I found it.

Honestly, I do not expect that the exterior of the aircraft perfectly match the real one. Raul has already explained in a video why the gear pin latch could not be modeled at its real place (inside the gear bay). This is a sim limitation. I would be more interested by a comparison concerning the avionics or the flight model for example.

Unable yet. This is an option available in the real Garmin (I verified in the manual : "AUX-SYSTEM Set up"), but not modeled in the Working Title version.

Unable to download the plane... At 100%, I get a messahe that the download failed.

Available right now ! Much work to do tonight...

A fantastic aircraft for sure !

I discovered and tested today this wonderful little app. It is really a game changer for all GA aircrafts. It allows a very fine trim tuning, different for each plane I own, for the wheel as for the electric trims as well. Bravo and many thanks for its dev !

For sure. I often fly there with Active Sky and I have no snow.

Well done. Have a happy new year with Chaseplane, but don't forget the champagne in the cabin... without transition but with moderation !

It's yours to decide. Bindings are very easy in Chaseplane and you may have far more options than in MSFS (limited to 10 views). As you do, I'm using the MSFS2020 keyboard and mouse controls. I only duplicated the general profiles for all my controlers (the yoke as well) and then deleted the camera assignments. After that, you may assign the same keys or same axis in Chaseplane as those you are using in MSFS. It's probably quicker to let Chaseplane erase all your camera settings, but I wanted to be sure to keep my initial ones without having eventually to desinstall the program.