Ponymetzger

Ok. We still use the sim for procedures, CRM etc. and not for its physics. But yeah got it. And thats the problem: Cause Streamer XYZ said product XYZ is superior, any different opinion is wrong. Thats such a joke.

1. The FBW is not snappy enough. Normally the Airbus responds way faster and way smoother than the Fenix FWB. Compared to the FENIX you can fly the real thing more precise. 2. random pitch up and down moments. The Fenix has the tendency to counteract many speed variations with the pitch, what is correct in the theory but not in this excessive way. 3. Jumping of speeds, on the fenix the speed jumps from time to time : Vref - 250 - Vref etc. 4. Flaps: again, random pitch down moments --> tendency to ignore the path for some seconds. I have my CPL since 2021 and now flying for a LHGroupe airline with under 500h. Thats just my interpretation of the Fenix. Things can vary here, it depends on the pilot, the procedures etc.

Not superior, but better than the FENIX for the moment. To prepare our type rating, besides the cbts,OMs etc., they recommended the Xplane for the 32X family and said that the FENIX,Aerosoft and FSLabs would be negative training. But I really don't get all the hate when you say something negative about the FENIX. When you say something negative about PMDG or any other developer, you are getting upvotes to the moon, but if you say something negative about the Fenix, you will get plenty of negative comments. The Fenix is not bad, and it does many things well, but it's not perfect, and it has some problems. Nothing new. I really don't get all the love the Fenix receives. It's a nice-looking aircraft, and it's a good procedure trainer, but the fly by wire is wonky and off, and the flight model has its problems. Thats all. It does not make it a bad Addon for Flight Simulator (a game), but it's also not the best airliner at the moment. Yes, the PMDG has no EFB (stupid discussion; they should focus more on the 777 instead of an EFB), and she is a bit old-school, but she does many things right and is a joy to fly.

Reported, what a complete toxic post once again. 600VFR is not 320 btw.

420 and you ? But I remember you were the guy who told us the WT 787 is as good as the PMDG.

It's the PMDG, even without this stupid and not-needed EFB. The FENIX flight model is completely off, and the flybywire feels wrong and completely weird. The flybywire from FBW is far better, for example. These are things they can't fix. Of course, I did. The PMDG is still the best airliner out there.

Nope... There is plenty of room for the FSLABS. Overall, the FSLabs was the better simulation of the A320. It would be really nice to have them back.

Using the LH787 with the mask, accepting AirAsia planes in Frankfurt and capping frames to 30. There's nothing to add here, and it's safe to say that you are not the target customer here.

Mathijs from Aerosoft already mentioned something in this direction: "We are 99% sure the sim will be fully compatible. At this moment it really just looked like an 'action-pack' thing"

Maybe read the comment again? Just 1+1.

To be honest, we all know that PMDG will do a 787. With the displays of the Max, the 777 and 777-9x it's really easy to do for them and much more likely than a 757.

So the 748 is the 747-400 ? Nice. didn't know that.

Grow up.

Sorry, but come on. We all know that he meant the PMDG or do we have another 748?

No wrong. 1.) WT releases a beta of a set of avionics 2.) Someone starts to compare it to PMDG and says it feels the same. 3.) Some guys have serious concerns about this ridiculous statement of the OP. VNAV step climb 35.000 to 37.000 with a V/S of 6000ft on a 11h longhaul does not feel the same like a PMDG.