carlanthony24

Strange about the A350 which you was singing praises for. The "general reception" on the other hand was bad.

Did a 4hr flight coming into land, wasm at 150ft engines stuck in auto thrust mode. Few months before completed a flight no problem. Only difference did an RNAV approach compared to ILS. It's not a bad aircraft to fly, wouldn't mind a high fidelity one though. "their last 2 aircraft had good releases." Even with all the wasm crashes still and bugs reported. No doubt Tuskin38 will praise the A380 no matter what.

"If something is airline-specific, then it should not necessarily be left to an “implicit understanding” of the user. In fact, other developers have specifically identified and documented these differences as airline-specific configurations, precisely so there is no ambiguity about what is being represented." Even then airline pilots still get it wrong when this is mentioned. So really makes no difference.

People are struggling on 40-50 series cards. The FSLabs has always been performance heavy

After everything that happened with v1 version it would of caused uproar if it wasn't.

Works fine here

Wouldn't call them minor bugs.

Flightsim.toSynaptic A220 ACARS/CPDLC - MSFS Add-on - Flightsim.to✓ For Microsoft Flight Simulator: This add-on introduces ACARS and CPDLC functionality to the Synaptic A220, supporting Hoppie Vatsim, SayIntentions.AI, and experimental BeyondATC networks. Features i Great job from someone in the community.

The fact is it's not working in normal operation has it is per BrianW post. So it needs to be simulated.

if you have a pack failure in normal operation you turn them off. In normal operation cabin pressurisation should change along with temperature so the correct function needs to be simulated. One can argue the marketing they have put in the FAQ. "All core aircraft systems have been rewritten to achieve our standards for accuracy and performance."

The classic don’t buy argument doesn’t work anymore. Weak argument when customers care about our hobby. What is poor reflection is letting developers get away with releasing products that shouldn’t be. Released in such a state. I don’t agree with the threats developers get, but then paying customers shouldn’t be getting name called either by people associated with the team either has a tester or some other way. No one expects perfect day one, but it’s a regular occurrence with some to release a plane with bugs that shouldn’t be in a release package. It was mentioned performance had been fixed if I remember correctly. They still chose to release a product with a performance bug, autobreak bug but still chose to release, biggest issue ILS even though a bug in the real aircraft, testers saying it’s correct now all back tracking saying it is too excessive, with the direct contacts some developers have with Microsoft/Asobo they should have said not to release we will give you an updated version.

lucky

If customers never complain then developers would keep getting away with anything they can. Even though it already happens. Not sure if you remember FSS said VNAV was never used or hardly ever used but apparently real pilots told them this turned out not to be the case. If we didn't complain for features etc it would be a very quick way for developers to not get business.

Generally sloped on all runways. ini are generally good at sceneries, am hoping they have all the new gates and new entry/exit at golf rwy13

Freezing issue had that issue in the PMDG 737 before recently last week. You can still hear sim running and only happened when I wasn't focusing on the sim.