carlanthony24

It has already been done in flight sim. A guy uses this sheet its outdated but apparently the CL650 passed on the tests the person did.

"Many many developers beat us to using Navigraphs new format, but part of the time lag for us was the implementation of the entire ARINC 424/PANS-OPS with full compliance for all leg types. This is a pretty significant change, and while many developers have been reading the ARINC 424 for some time, they aren't actually doing the full suite of path computations with associated control logic to ensure the airplane complies with the defined path for specific procedural legs." Apparently they will be the first to do the full suite of path computations with associated control logic.

It had been fixed. Not widely reported now. Next update will be when SU15 is out since they have built around it.

At least they communicate why they have delayed the next update. Aamir literally confirmed its to do with SU15. PMDG say its nothing to do with SU15. Who knows we do not get the full story do they not want to blame Asobo again since they already done that.

Another lovely update. At least we get the 200 and 300 at some point. Shame they lost the developer. Maybe people will understand why they may not give frequent updates and they have other priorities.

Like I previously mentioned they are not full time compared to FSLabs who are. I guess if they were full time we could of had one sooner. We are 4 years without a 747-400/F potentially 5 years away by the time PMDG are finished with releasing the Triple and the Max. 4 years from a decent A330(Aerosoft) People may think they have missed the mark. Others may not. Especially since the product can be used to help train people etc. Legacy dev's I can think of is PMDG which ported the 737 over and who knows if the Triple will be the same not sure if Ini did the same with the A300 etc from Xplane but took them a while to release.

Only the other day I saw some of the FSLabs team flying the A321 Neo around guarantee they not lose revenue if they decide to make it a package with the CEO variants but may if they do it like a single package who knows. They make money by selling the licences for hardware too. Of course everyone is entitled to an opinion never said they weren't. Of course PMDG is making the most of it but if IFLY release a Max before PMDG and I would say it would be cheaper than PMDG they would of missed the mark even though they say they don't care what IFLY do.

Well they have they have mentioned they are making for MSFS. A post by one of the staff Folks... All the best to All for 2024!Yes, it has been very quiet on the forums but that does not mean work does not continue. All is well amidst our busy 8 to 5 work and family schedules.Our Team is steadily moving along with development for MSFS 2020, and we will be sure to share information and or images when we are satisfied with the progress.Stay tuned!Cheers. Hi xxxWe will be sure to do so when we feel that it is time to do so.We will not be sharing images or videos of progress until we have everything aligned to do so.Bear in mind, we do have other obligations such as other jobs and family obligations (parents, wife and kids).I can however assure you that work is progressing.Cheers. They announced if I remember correctly should be still on the forum somewhere they would be finishing the products for P3D this was when MSFS released. They then came with another update to do with issues they were facing while dealing with MSFS etc. Take Quality Wings for example we heard one thing and a screenshot then nothing. Can't do much when they have other jobs that pays the bills. Seem like its not full time work for them and these posts are only just over a month ago You could say PMDG as missed a mark by bringing out a the 777-300 first or even just the freighter first/released with the 300. You could say they missed a mark by not bringing out the 747 before the Triple. Maybe they missed the mark by not bringing out the 737 Max. At least Majestic have said things compared to FSLabs. I doubt they are worried they know it will be the best when every it releases.

Not sure how they missed the mark. Like most developers working from scratch and was still working on the training/cockpit version. When it comes to MSFS then you know they will be making from it since from what I know, no one else is making one let alone be as good.

LondonController is streaming should be stormy but nothing.

According to the pricing FAQ see your preferred reseller for more information on final pricing I am guessing it will just be sold through Sim market, Just Flight, Aerosoft and Flight1

The ignition part is correct now. Jerky buttons fix posted in discord for time being worked for me. https://discord.com/channels/736572376967282769/1229445435761098834/1229580178192334948

Perfect thank you for the reply.

I might have missed something but do we just keep MSFS weather active if using direct MSFS integration?

It does not have weather radar. Not Fenix or any other developers fault with it being so basic. I believe the reason FBW got rid was it was a massive FPS hit.

You really have to just look at the one main person who does it and most feel the same way. We get it they like PMDG better but if you can't read displays like aircrafts have and trying to compare to a very different aircraft you need to think before saying.

New update I guess will just be after SU15 if not on it. People just love to moan even though they have IRL pilots who deal with the same things on daily basis

Comparing screens from two different aircraft's is pointless. Its also been said by IRL pilots that screens will just fade to be darker as time goes on.

Four complaints tells you exactly how people feel about the displays not an issue for the other 57,701 members in the discord give or take ones with verified accounts.

Since F737MAX said what is on the PFD the ND reads gs177 tas184 290/13 1512 222 0.1nm 13:51 KEWR 22L. Read from my phone. Funny it’s still not widely talked about.

Article https://fselite.net/content/hifi-sim-tech-announces-active-sky-fs-for-msfs/?fbclid=IwAR0pTbsP6l-6Upni7-KELR-Cak-jP54iV7InbD4Yl2vdd7JKakOMvO77QZM Finally a decent weather system that hopefully will not cause problems and give us weather and clouds that should be showing correctly.

It is. I know they were working on CPDLC can't remember what else but they have just shown some new images of the 787-10. Best way to find things would be the discord.

This is why they encourage low turbulance but MSFS and weather we all know how that handles. Not sure if you used the FSLabs at all in P3D but just like Fenix also had the autopilot disconnecting with the slightest bit of turbulence which they did manage to tune but still happened regardless. Even flying the 737 the other day wind shifted along with pressure and I was at least a 1000ft below cruise

IAE is more powerful.

Flaps 3 is used quite a bit especially one carrier in the UK. It’s not a bug. Obviously the airline they have the data which mostly go for opt and spits out flap 3 “There is no one method of calculating take-off performance. The current implementation is based from one real world operator which optimises for TOPL, which in some cases doesn't make a lot of sense, but is what the real one does for various other reasons. Because of this you'll generally see flap 3 because the maximum take-off weight in that configuration is usually higher than if you'd be using flap 1+F. In such cases where your desired take-off flap is different to the one that the "OPT" setting produces then just manually select the flap setting.”