carlanthony24

Not at the moment, not sure if its something they will introduce.

A300B4 will be on preview

I doubt they will.

Yes both are made

Zendesk can also be also be used. True being that devs of third parties mention not to use default nav data. Even inibuilds mention it.

You can easily run into issues with the default nav data this is why third parties encourage you to use Navigraph. Can easily be missing certain procedures, glitches with FMC routes. Buy a Navigraph sub for one month and then cancel it keep you going till something drastic changes with the airport.

The Q400 is very popular among simmers. So much Majestic intially iirc said they wouldn't update for P3D V4/5. Feedback wise people weren't happy so they're rebuilt it.

E-Jets very much needed

Last 4 flights landed 2.4-3.5 no problems here. Fresh wind uplinks, I don't know if you fly with atc? You don't say what fuel you are landing with?

E Jets next hopefully If they can go the same way they've done with the A380, i'll be happy.

Yeah MAN doesn't have C stands just gates. 206-214. 206 seems to be most common when I've been. 12 can be used. 62 and 61 only get used has an overflow.

This is what I've been saying but according to Tuskin no difference which if you do research you can find out its not true. Well it can be cheaper on the ini store and I would rather wait for some updates before buying day 1

Apparently people aren't getting all the sounds through which according to staff member happened with L1011. Can take a while to come through on marketplace. Didn't know about this certainly a disadvantage and another reason I would rather wait till it's released on ini store.

I would advise looking up the differences.

Do you understand the differences between the two. More advantages of having it downloaded.

Perfect example people don't want to stream it and would rather download for many reasons but they're all getting stuck and being told to restart the sim. This wouldn't happen if it was released on ini store.

My 2 reproducible. Helsinki to Brussels every decent. Other one to do with going out of Gran Canaria every time I put simbrief route. Both cases turned out to be code they’re hadn’t cleaned up.

I don’t hate Inibuilds literally praised the a380 earlier up maybe you missed it or chose to ignore what I put. I actually think the a380 seems more stable than the A350 everything just seems so much better. I feel you are missing the point. Ini products don’t have the best reputation with wasm, but the A350 was the worst release coming from many and still complain.

I think you have an odd way of of showing how bias you are. Like you said apparently what major defects are left in the A350. Enough for them to have to make a V2 and saying to someone it must be their system for something on the A220 wild you say its everyones system each time something happens.

Just look at each post you do glazing. Has soon has someone has an issue you say I don't, good for you don't but don't pretend plenty do.

You still can't go around saying its stable when it clearly isn't for evidently a lot the fact like I said many are skeptical but yeah you gloss.

Tons well the forum and discords say otherwise. Even someone has reported and no one got back to them.

Yeah and only ini seem to get the most so forgive if people are still skeptical when you can't do a short flight in a long haul aircraft without getting one.

Have you reported. Has much as I hate PMDG practices they solved plenty with the HDU update. I also could reproduce one that no one else got reported and well it got fixed.

No it's just ini love using wasm and nothing to do with people's systems. PMDG you might get someone have one if lucky every 6 months. Just no excuse for it at the end of the day. If PMDG can fix them so can ini. Then again I expected nothing less for you to glaze with something they seem to have the most trouble of that no other developer has this much trouble.