mmcmah

The only thing I can think of with the AIG models is to delete the aitraffic-modelbehavior folder and re-run AIG. It should recreate the folder once you verify the setup. If you look at the PSXT logs, were the AIG models even being used (before suggesting you alter your AIG setup)?

I just checked with 15.5.0 and my lights are working fine. I don't know which models you are using, but did you follow these steps from the manual, if you are using AIG: "2.4. Install AI aircraft packages Recommended packages are AIG, FSLTL, JustFlight and IVAO_MTL (see the QuickStart Guide). Important if you are using AIG in MSFS: The lights of AI aircraft are also controlled by MSFS which may conflict with PSXT, and is sometimes completely wrong. You may see taxiing aircraft with strobes on for instance. To fix this, go to \Community\aig-aigtraffic-modelbehavior\ModelBehaviorDefs\AIG\Customization.xml and set in AIG_TC_PSXT_Check_Parameters, AIG_TC at False"

That is a great suggestion. I found myself wondering the same thing yesterday when I first tried the Auto Park feature and then switched to RT Parked only. It made such a large difference in the way KDEN felt, that I had to turn Auto Park back on. Of course, I don't know if there is a "preference" already built into Auto Park that already takes the RT parked planes into account.

It's not just the colors. Look at the parking lot on the bottom towards the left of my PG OFF picture. It has no cars in it and it is not in the PG ON image. Your image has it as well. Same with the two white rectangular shapes to the right of that lot that look kind of like semi trailers. I wonder if PG might have gotten turned off by an update? Anyway, thanks for trying to share your view. That was exactly what I was trying to see.

I'm obviously not able to see your settings, but here are two pictures with and without PG from roughly the same location as your screen shot. PG ON: PG OFF: To my eye, the one with PG Off looks nigh on identical to your image. You can tell from the roof coloring and lack of detail. The PG version has a lot more detail and different things on the buildings and around the area.

Thank you. I believe you have PG off for that shot? Mine looks just like that if I turn PG off.

I used postimages.org, uploaded the screenshot to it and then copied the Direct Link and pasted it into the message.

Thanks Bill. I would really love for that to be the reason. I just loaded into KBDU, which is one of the airports listed in the latest update notes for Bijan's Seasons as having had PG trees removed. Here is a picture that I took from the southwest corner of the airfield, looking out towards a neighborhood that borders the airport. The airport itself looks great, but as you can see, the neighborhood on the left, which is immediately next to the airport has the blobs that I am talking about. Do you see the same in your setup, or do you see sharp trees there as well?

I haven't used the Map Enhancement tool since moving to 2024. I don't have a real problem with the scenery overall (once I discovered that City Update 10 was responsible for MANY terrain issues). What really does bother me is the sense that the photogrammetry trees have become WAY WAY worse than in 2020. I can fly anywhere without seeing melted blobs that are supposed to pass for trees. This is worth Bijan's Seasons installed also, which makes many trees look better. It makes low flying horrible.

I haven't used the Map Enhancement tool since moving to 2024. I don't have a real problem with the scenery overall (once I discovered that City Update 10 was responsible for MANY terrain issues). What really does bother me is the sense that the photogrammetry trees have become WAY WAY worse than in 2020. I can't fly anywhere without seeing melted blobs that are supposed to pass for trees, often tons of them. This is even with Bijan's Seasons installed also, which makes many trees look better. It makes low flying horrible.

Thank you Nico! I can confirm that the fix worked. Enjoy your time away!

Nico, I was able to get onto my computer to test the re-scan process. I saw that the files in the ./airports/my_thirdparty/ folder were cleared when I pressed the scan button and they started repopulating as the airport scan progressed. At the end, I opened up the KPSP.txt file that was created 10 minutes ago and these are its contents: "archive/thirdparty/INIBUILDS/KPSP.xml" - just as before. Here is the log from the session with the same download error as before. Log file

According to the Navigraph forums, this was their response in May 2024 about this (https://forum.navigraph.com/t/lytv-tivat-missing-circle-to-land-charts/15734): Hi, according the AIP Serbia-Montenegro, there are no approaches for 14 available any longer. The AIP lists only departures for 14 but no STARs or IAPs. Hope that helps Richard

I missed the spoiler button in the "+" menu when I wrote my response (thank you @SierraDelta ! I did try to look for it, but as I had said, I was unable to find it. I will try the rescan to see if the my_thirdparty file for KPSP is correctly repopulated, even though it was rescanned in the last few days anyway. If the file isn't correct, I will try deleting the contents and trying again. I will then report back. It won't be until next week, though.

So I guess I should delete the contents of the my_thirdparty folder?