MaximumN2

Interesting, because the rate of climb of iFly is still incorrect, she climbs like a NG.

As someone who has flown the A319, A320, and A321 for years and is now flying the 777, I can confidently say that the PMDG aircraft are more accurate in every single aspect. What Real Life experience do you have that led you to a different conclusion?

That's not the reason, but it's okay. The reason is the Fenix cult, the poor modelling (which is true, unfortunately), and the fact that it's just another Airbus when everyone already had one. It has nothing to do with which of them is the better add-on. And "streamers" aren't a good source. They usually just follow what the masses do; and the mass are like kids who love good-looking toys like the Fenix. That's why you get people claiming that Fenix is the top-of-the-line developer and has surpassed PMDG by a wide margin. If you say something like that, you've lost all credibility and are obviously completely clueless.

True, but it's still the better Airbus simulation. Maybe Fenix can surpass it one day, hopefully, but at the moment, FSLabs is still a fair bit more complete.

FSLabs is still ahead when it comes to Airbus. Fenix has some work to do to surpass FSLabs in terms of depth and systems

777/787

Did you ever own an FSLabs Airbus, or are you just trash-talking without any clue?

Aha, and why? Its a different plane, or do you really expect a discount from your beloved and overhyped Fenix when they release the Neos? They will ask for full price as well. Weird take, to be honest.

Too difficult for some guys. It’s easier to spam the internet instead.

None of our comments were toxic, and it’s quite a shame that you’re framing this situation as toxic with absolutely zero self-reflection. You received plenty of good advice and constructive criticism, such as that you’re spamming your videos on every platform, that you’re using misleading titles, or that you’re relying on an add-on that is not capable of showing proper procedures. But sure, we are all toxic and you’re right. You can continue doing your thing and spamming the entire internet with clickbait and spread some negative training.

No, I haven’t, because I am rated and prefer to read the manuals provided by the company that released the add-on or the OM of an operator. That’s where you can see the limitations and how it should be flown. There is absolutely no need for a video that is not made by someone who knows the aircraft by heart or is rated on type. Especially when you boost your content with titles like these, which are clearly incorrect and do not represent your actual level of knowledge. It’s simply misleading.

What are those AI-written answers? It stays the same just a cheap method with no real value, only meant to get clicks. Once we get the TriStar, there will be enough videos from people who actually have experience on the type, and not just from JustPlanes videos.

But I don’t see any value in this kind of content. To me, it seems like a cheap method to boost your YouTube channel using clickbait topics and cross-posting them on almost every forum and on Reddit.

Yeah, the guy is spamming these videos the whole time to boost his YouTube channel, but they have no value, to be honest.

There is also no 4080ti... 😉