MaximumN2

Interesting, because the rate of climb of iFly is still incorrect, she climbs like a NG.

As someone who has flown the A319, A320, and A321 for years and is now flying the 777, I can confidently say that the PMDG aircraft are more accurate in every single aspect. What Real Life experience do you have that led you to a different conclusion?

That's not the reason, but it's okay. The reason is the Fenix cult, the poor modelling (which is true, unfortunately), and the fact that it's just another Airbus when everyone already had one. It has nothing to do with which of them is the better add-on. And "streamers" aren't a good source. They usually just follow what the masses do; and the mass are like kids who love good-looking toys like the Fenix. That's why you get people claiming that Fenix is the top-of-the-line developer and has surpassed PMDG by a wide margin. If you say something like that, you've lost all credibility and are obviously completely clueless.

True, but it's still the better Airbus simulation. Maybe Fenix can surpass it one day, hopefully, but at the moment, FSLabs is still a fair bit more complete.

777/787

Did you ever own an FSLabs Airbus, or are you just trash-talking without any clue?

Aha, and why? Its a different plane, or do you really expect a discount from your beloved and overhyped Fenix when they release the Neos? They will ask for full price as well. Weird take, to be honest.

Too difficult for some guys. It’s easier to spam the internet instead.

None of our comments were toxic, and it’s quite a shame that you’re framing this situation as toxic with absolutely zero self-reflection. You received plenty of good advice and constructive criticism, such as that you’re spamming your videos on every platform, that you’re using misleading titles, or that you’re relying on an add-on that is not capable of showing proper procedures. But sure, we are all toxic and you’re right. You can continue doing your thing and spamming the entire internet with clickbait and spread some negative training.

No, I haven’t, because I am rated and prefer to read the manuals provided by the company that released the add-on or the OM of an operator. That’s where you can see the limitations and how it should be flown. There is absolutely no need for a video that is not made by someone who knows the aircraft by heart or is rated on type. Especially when you boost your content with titles like these, which are clearly incorrect and do not represent your actual level of knowledge. It’s simply misleading.

What are those AI-written answers? It stays the same just a cheap method with no real value, only meant to get clicks. Once we get the TriStar, there will be enough videos from people who actually have experience on the type, and not just from JustPlanes videos.

But I don’t see any value in this kind of content. To me, it seems like a cheap method to boost your YouTube channel using clickbait topics and cross-posting them on almost every forum and on Reddit.

Yeah, the guy is spamming these videos the whole time to boost his YouTube channel, but they have no value, to be honest.

There is also no 4080ti... 😉

Not that hard to read the linked blog post https://parallel42.jitbit.com/KB/View/78808941-how-do-i-transfer-my-purchases-from-other-stores- Offtopic: There is no 4090 Ti (according to your specs) 😉

PMDG's version is also close. Must be the best soundpack ever...

Because GSX is pure garbage, it has barely improved over the years. So many things are missing or bugged, but when you report those issues, they always point the finger at others, they never admit to making mistakes. I think GSX will always stay the way it currently is. It’s a shame, but we really need a new player here. Maybe the rumors are true and Fenix is developing its own counterpart for their Airbus lineup, because we really need one.

I honestly doubt it. We all know PMDG; system-wise, they make great airplanes, if not the best, but they don’t care enough about art and sound design. So, I guess it will be a huge letdown again and won’t sound like a real 777 once again.

Maybe because they said: "We will be offering a public beta next week for those on SU4"

They always perform extremely badly, especially the A350. I can barely fly this thing with all the stutters and poor performance. The Neos and the A330 are okay-ish but not good.

For me, with the Ini, I don't know what they did, but it's like night and day. It nearly doubled my performance in Singapore with the Ini A350. Same stand, same traffic; I had 90 FPS before with FG x4 (5090 and 285k), and now I'm getting 170+ FPS. Amazing! Hopefully, they can maintain this level of performance. Even when increasing the TLOD setting (up to 400) , the performance remains excellent.

What’s the point of comments like “Never had this” or “Never heard of this issue”? This is a valid and fairly widespread issue in 2024. Nearly everyone I know experiences this problem, and it’s incredibly annoying and frustrating; especially when using a headset.

It's lovely how people tend to forget that they've missed every single deadline they've ever given us by several months. I mean, those were great updates, but this constant narrative in every thread "Fenix=GOAT and PMDG=bad" is so childish. But sure, that's how it's done.

Impressive how much nonsense can be written in so few words.