>Same here Jan,>>on the very rare occasion that I pop into the FSX forum I saw>a post on water reflections. (which I believe was the main>contributor to the sales of FSX :-hah)>>Then I saw a link as to what water should/could really look>like! :-eek>> http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/73018.html>

>regards>Wow!Is there an addon that will make FS9 look like those videos? :-lol L.Adamson

>Is there an addon that will make FS9 look like those videos? There most certainly is not! :(But I shall probably buy the game just to look at the water... :-outta

regardsEdaka Capt. P[/font color]i[/font color]c[/font color]a[/font color]s[/font color]s[/font color]o[/font color]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v640/edetroit100/Ed3.jpgMy FS9 Videos] AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1024Mb PC3200 DDR, 300Gb HD 256Mb DDR Nvidia 7800 GTX PCI-E, Audigy 2 ZSViewsonic VP2130b 21.3" LCD[/font color

Not even for FSX. :-lol

New versions arent always the best, just look at the life of dBase.III+ was the best, after that it was downhill.FSX is no difference.They didnt improve, but changed.JohanA LITTLE LESS CONVERSATION, AND A LITTLE MORE ACTION PLEASE..http://www.jdserver.mine.nu/johan

To answer the origianl posters question. FSX has slowed down the progress of any 3rd party addon that is going to make addons for fs9 and fsx. i think FSX shoudl not have come out when it did. i havent seen a good quality addon panel for over 8 months. we used to see them every 4-6 months.

dBase III was one of the all time classics, in a league of it's own at the time.I'll submit Close Combat III as a game classic. Because of the multitude of add-ons many people still consider it the best of the CC series.