July 5, 201114 yr I really appreciate that PMDG will do the 777 but i really hope they include one of th most common variants, the -300ER. That would be nice :) regards, Alexander Marx
July 5, 201114 yr One thing I dont understand is that you want ultra realism ala PMDG, but you want to ruin the immersion factor by using time accelleration. Why dont you just fly a 40 minute route if thats the max you can take before you get bored instead?Just for the sake of curiosity what do you usually do to fill those 10 hours while your 747 brings you from Frankfurt to Sidney ?
July 5, 201114 yr Just for the sake of curiosity what do you usually do to fill those 10 hours while your 747 brings you from Frankfurt to Sidney ?Whatever the wife tells me. Best Regards, Dan Parkin.
July 5, 201114 yr Whatever the wife tells me. I do the same Matias SorcinelliCHECK MY CHANNEL!!! - http://www.youtube.com/user/masneoquil
July 5, 201114 yr Ah the benefits of flying in the real world, no wife in the back seat telling you to paint the house or varnish the garden furniture, and if she is in the back, she can't talk to you for security reasons...Speaking of which, I was supposed to be on a weeks holidays last week but ended up just doing said chores... Sigh... Rónán O Cadhain.
July 5, 201114 yr Common sense should prevail......777 has been around for 16 yrs plus it started commercial service with United Airlines as the launch customer. The 787 will be in service soon once it receives certification from the FAA and other aviation bodies, But I would like to see down the line a really excellent Boeing 787 for FSX.:( Kenneth M."PUP"Craddock IIPC: Alienware Aurora R4 Intel I7-3820.....As for the rest is classified http://pup4ordfsxmore.blogspot.com/
Create an account or sign in to comment