aceridgey

To be honest, to do this every single time to just be able to do a flight is a little extreme for me. Looking into the third party options like Vortex above. Is it worth asking Microsoft of is that just a waste of time?

Do you pay subscriptions annually?

Hi guys Any tips for windows 10 virus protection I have the antimalware running with p3d and it is taking up 30-40% of my CPU usage. I've looked into disabling it without success but one of the articles recommends a different antio virus which is less power consuming? https://imgur.com/a/EsTFPzK

Jos. That's length of the aircraft not the range......

Pilots would not use the EFB to calculate a flight plan, so PFPX profile is neccessary for that. The one thing we don't need anymore is a topcat profile, which I can't stress how pleased I am to see PMDG finally model a takeoff/landing performance. Kind regards, Alex

Do you guys now have FXAA to on?

Hi guys, I changed a couple of settings around and now see really bad shimmering. Running a medium/high end pc. The effect looks like the tall thin objects 'sparkle or glitter' Settings https://imgur.com/HZ95KNq https://imgur.com/UWlTzmy

Very simply because the 300ER has an almost identical engine to the 200LR..

Meow. I feel your reply is a little unfair as I was trying to entice debate and discussion. I don't think it's unfair of me to say that you haven't kept the community updated, and it was implied that we would be waiting months. A small update to say that the 200ER slipped would have been great, rather than ignore the subject completely. I appreciate your response, extremely glad it's still on the cards, would appreciate a little less personal dig though ;) Cheers, Alex

For me, the 77L has too much performance for me to feel satisfied with swapping with the 200ER. I predominantly fly BAV and some routes are performance restricted, which will definitely not be the case for the 77L. I think also with the quantity of 777-200ERs in existence, I felt it justified that PMDG would at least release an expansion for it, my worry, with a declining fleet, it will never get done, and the 200er never feature in our simulators of any quality.

Out of interest. For the amount of development work that went into the 777 project and for a comparatively low development time to release a 200er. Why didn't it get developed with the 300er? I believe one if the most popular threads ever on avsim with about the 200ER. Kind regards Alex

Hi all, I see a lot of interest, admittedly a little by myself, about the 777-200ER. Can we please have a statement either way about whether PMDG still intend to make this product? In the initial product release, the intro manual stated the 200er will be coming out months after the initial release. And we have had absolutely no word since. It would be sincerely appreciated if we can just have a up to date progress check, either way, whether we will be getting this addon. As a query, if you don't intend to do the differences in performance, please could we have a 200er visual mod (like you did the 747-8 back in the day). Thank you in advance, This is the statement from PMDG on the 200ER on an earlier manual. https://imgur.com/a/WcZ79

Sorry to bump this. Any more ideas? I want to try some vfr flying but orbx england performance is so poor compared to lc

I created a thread also yesterday, I am getting the crash still.

Hi all, Appreciate 4.2 has just come out but just to let you know every loading with the 747 i get a crash. Weirdly the 777 works fine Faulting application name: Prepar3D.exe, version: 4.2.21.24048, time stamp: 0x5a7c832c Faulting module name: facilities.dll, version: 4.2.21.24048, time stamp: 0x5a7c828e Exception code: 0xc0000005 Fault offset: 0x000000000001fd91 Faulting process ID: 0x858 Faulting application start time: 0x01d3a42c18003f98 Faulting application path: D:\Prepar3D v4\Prepar3D.exe Faulting module path: D:\Prepar3D v4\facilities.dll Report ID: 1c00ef33-ffc9-4f26-8d94-bfe861970191 Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID: