Hey guys just wanted to get your thoughts on the CH products flight sim yoke. Is it what you pay for in a cheaper model? or is it just fine for FSX?I mainly fly the NGX if that helps. Just want the most realistic experience. Thank youBrad

I've heard that those plastic yokes are the best you can get for the money. But, stickiness is what plagues them - of course, what would one expect from plastic?PFC are what one would call an immersion, they are durable, smooth, but... expensive.This is why I bought Saitek yokes twice, and twice returned them.It's simply not possible to get non-sticky product - the worst problem appear when you trying flying one-handedly and then pull on elevator - good luck with that.That is the reason also why I'm on the joystick. Maybe not as real as it gets, but I can do real precision landings, probably as precise as with the big real yoke.

I have been using the CH yoke, pedals, and throttle quad for years without a problem. I have the older version, I dont like the new one that has a pan switch on both sides.

I have the CH Eclipse (the one with hat switches on both sides as indicated by Jay) and love it. It's two best features are NOT having a center detent like the Saitek yokes and it's small but very effective dual clamps that keep it completely immobile no matter how violent I am with it.As far as the product being plastic, yes it is. However, it is not the kind of plastic you find used for childrens toys or Logitech joysticks (shameless jab). It is industrial grade plastic that doesn't feel or look cheap, but feels sturdy and well made. For me it's like feeling the plastic in a BMW vice a Kia.The stickiness that some have complained of is easily cured with any kind of industrial silicone lubricant put on the shaft, and you don't even need to open it up to do it. Just apply it on both ends and exercise the yoke forwards and backwards to distribute it at the points that have the potential to bind (which is primarily the front and back bushings that allow the yoke shaft to move through the shell of the yoke).

I have been using the older CH yoke along with CH pedals and throttle quadrant for years. They are very reliable. I had some problems with the yoke sticking when it was new. I tried lubricating the shaft, but it didn't help much. (Be sure to use a lubricant made for plastics). I ended up taking it apart and sanded, then polished the plastic shaft. While I was at it, I installed slightly weaker springs. It now works smooth as glass. Keep in mind, that not everyone has the sticking problem and taking the yoke apart voids the warranty. When this one finally gives out, I would consider the Saitek yoke, but I'm concerned about the center detent. The Eclipse yoke uses exactly the same plastic shaft and spring design as the older CH yoke, so it may have the same "sticking" problem.I'm surprised that CH hasn't upgraded to a metal shaft and better bushings. Otherwise, they are a quality product.Dale

Wow guys thanks so much for the response!!I think I am going with the CH Eclipse. So if i'm correct the eclipse just added switches on both sides? Is that the only difference?CH and Saitek seem to be fairly competitive would I be correct in this statement? or does one seem to rise above the other?Once again guys really appreciate the feedback!!SincerelyBrad

Respective product pages:CH Flight Yoke: http://www.chproducts.com/retail/y_fsyusb.htmlCH Eclipse Yoke: http://www.chproducts.com/retail/y_eclipse.htmlAs far as CH vs Saitek, yes they both compete for the amateur yoke users crowd. As far as one being better than the other comes down to personal preference.

...stickiness is what plagues them - of course, what would one expect from plastic?...

Word Not Allowed, the plastic stickiness problem has been solved for yars now with a $5 aerosol can of Dupont Teflon Silicone. Apply every six months. Note the addition of Teflon really makes a difference.

I have been using the CH yoke, pedals, and throttle quad for years without a problem. I have the older version, I dont like the new one that has a pan switch on both sides.

+1.Also note CH gear potentiometers are user-replaceable (if you knw your way around with a soldering iron), whereas Saitek pots are far more difficult to replace.Cheers,- jahman.

I will sell you the CH Flight Yoke: http://www.chproduct...l/y_fsyusb.html for 50$ plus shipping? I also have the rudder peddles and will through those into the lot for 25$ can provide pictures just PM me...Take Care

Also note CH gear potentiometers are user-replaceable (if you knw your way around with a soldering iron), whereas Saitek pots are far more difficult to replace.Cheers,- jahman.

I should point out that the pots for the X and Y axis on the Eclipse Yoke (I don't own the original so not sure) don't require solder as they use slide on contacts instead of solder, making for an even easier repair if needed.

I should point out that the pots for the X and Y axis on the Eclipse Yoke (I don't own the original so not sure) don't require solder as they use slide on contacts instead of solder, making for an even easier repair if needed.

IFF you can get them. You can but the CH pots at Radio Shack...Cheers,- jahman.

IFF you can get them. You can but the CH pots at Radio Shack...Cheers,- jahman.

You can get them direct from CH if you want to: http://www.chproduct...shop/parts.htmlYou can also get replacement springs, knobs, USB connector cables, clamps and clamp extenders.

You can get them direct from CH if you want to: http://www.chproduct...shop/parts.htmlYou can also get replacement springs, knobs, USB connector cables, clamps and clamp extenders.

You misread my post: The "IFF you can get" them refers to the Saitek pots.Cheers,- jahman.