January 11, 201214 yr For anyone that hasn't seen it yet, I think MS have done a really good job with the autogen in Flight. Forests absolutely packed full of trees, and without the horrible popping up out of nowhere you get in fsx. Thats even on a fairly modest computer... So i've heard :wink:FSX would be awesome with Flight's autogen/performance.
January 11, 201214 yr I doubt it. Turn off AI planes and cars and ships in FSX, fly a simple default plane, and you'll see quite the performance increase in FSX as well.. not unlike the one we see in Flight.
January 11, 201214 yr The F-haters do have a point though. No?Flying FSX with the parameters described above (to mimic flight) are incredible less taxing than flying around Heathrow with a high % of AI traffic.
January 11, 201214 yr The F-haters do have a point though. No?No. Edited January 11, 201214 yr by SpiritFlyer
January 11, 201214 yr Commercial Member No. Yes. In times of huge optimism about Flight I felt what Flight would really be as I am extremely skeptical against any game that is said to apply for wider audience or in other words go mainstream, and I was right about it not being whole world and have airliners by default. Now in times of some new optimism from nowhere I will still be right.
January 11, 201214 yr The F-Haters/Jaded lovers arent going to agree with you no matter how much better flight is!I think we need a more slick term for this. I have decided to adopt railway vernacular. They shall be known as gunzels and foamers from now on.
