EZDOK vs. A2A Accu-Sim

[Mean Aerodynamic Chord 269]

Okay thanks for the replies everyone.

[GHarrall 494]

This.

 

EZdock is for visual effects (among other things), Accu-feel is for sound. These are now must haves for my FSX install.

 

While Accu-feel is more geared toward GA planes, or older heavy iron (eg. B-17's and DC-3s) I've found it's still useful for airliners. One, You can have it generate the sound of air rushing past a well sealed cabin, giving that nice background 'white noise' you get with an airliner cruising along. Two, and my personal favorite for airliners, you can have it generate the drag sounds created when landing gear, flaps, or spoilers are deployed. This is highly immersive IMO.

 

Accu-Feel is not just sound.

 

It includes stall buffet and ground roll phyiscs amongst other 'airframe' effects. Sounds are just part of it.........

[FlyAndFight 37]

I've got both products and they are must-haves for me. They both add greatly to the immersion factor and that's what counts for me. Wouldn't fly FSX without them.

[fernmil 0]

I also have the two products and in my opinion the two are too different to be compared.

Actually I find it more reasonable to compare EZCA with OpusFSX FS Interface, especially the Live Camera feature it offers.

Anybody with experience in this?

 

rgds

Joop Jansen