Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
froggy

Rolls Royce EPR readout question

Recommended Posts

Throttle position is not directly related to fuel flow in a jet either, if you leave your throttle position constant and climb, your engine speed will vary a little but your fuel burn will decrease. EPR could remain similar, but you have less air to pressurize the higher you go. It is simply a pressure reading not a thrust amount.think of it like a 2500psi. pressure washer , at the end of the day you only move as much water as your water spicket can produce. Now think fire hose....

 

Good friend of mine teaches jet engine operations to pilots for Pratt & Whitney, the textbooks are great

 

Eric

Share this post


Link to post

It really seems strange that you would be able to leave the throttles at what constitutes climb thrust all the way up. I would be curious to pick your friends brain on that one as it doesn't seem to make sense to me. But maybe my understanding of EPR is worng. My assumptions have always been that EPR has nothing to do with the throttle position and everything to do with differential pressure between inlet and outlet. Sure adding fuel through the throttle will cause the engine to turn faster which generates a a greater differential pressure.

 

So.....here is the question for someone much smater than I am. As you go up, inlet pressure decreases. If the engine speed remains constant, then the ratio should stay the same. However, as you increase altitude, though the ratio would stay the same, the thrust would decrease. This is based on my understanding of Boyles law which summed up in this situation basically boils down to volume in = volume out. Now as the engines reach lower ambient temps, they are able to run a higher EPR and thus compensate for the loss of thrust that would exist if a constant EPR was kept. So whithout outside influence of throttle increase how is this possible? Does the 727 have better fuel control requiring less manual inputs?

Your understanding of EPR isn't wrong, it's exactly as you describe. Nor is EPR physically related to thrust lever position. However, you've assumed thrust doesn't decrease with altitude, but it does exactly that. That isn't a problem for aircraft performance as drag decreases too. There's nothing particularly special about the JT8D control system, quite the reverse, but as it happens you don't need to adjust thrust lever setting much to maintain the rated climb EPR. The EPR the engine produces at that thrust lever position will change as the aircraft climbs, but so also will the climb EPR setting, and the two roughly keep in alignment at the same lever angle.


ki9cAAb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post

Throttle position is not directly related to fuel flow in a jet either, if you leave your throttle position constant and climb, your engine speed will vary a little but your fuel burn will decrease. EPR could remain similar, but you have less air to pressurize the higher you go. It is simply a pressure reading not a thrust amount.

 

No, EPR is actually not a pressure reading, it's a ratio of two pressures, and changes of air density at different altitudes affect both pressures (exhaust press in the numerator and compressor press in the denominator), so EPR remains a reliable metric to measure thrust relative to maximum thrust at that air density throughout the altitude envelope. All measures of thrust (RPM or EPR) for a turbojet/turbofan are relative and not direct measures of thrust, which decreases with air density.

 

Regards


Bob Scott | President and CEO, AVSIM Inc
ATP Gulfstream II-III-IV-V

System1 (P3Dv5/v4): i9-13900KS @ 6.0GHz, water 2x360mm, ASUS Z790 Hero, 32GB GSkill 7800MHz CAS36, ASUS RTX4090
Samsung 55" JS8500 4K TV@30Hz,
3x 2TB WD SN850X 1x 4TB Crucial P3 M.2 NVME SSD, EVGA 1600T2 PSU, 1.2Gbps internet
Fiber link to Yamaha RX-V467 Home Theater Receiver, Polk/Klipsch 6" bookshelf speakers, Polk 12" subwoofer, 12.9" iPad Pro
PFC yoke/throttle quad/pedals with custom Hall sensor retrofit, Thermaltake View 71 case, Stream Deck XL button box

Sys2 (MSFS/XPlane): i9-10900K @ 5.1GHz, 32GB 3600/15, nVidia RTX4090FE, Alienware AW3821DW 38" 21:9 GSync, EVGA 1000P2
Thrustmaster TCA Boeing Yoke, TCA Airbus Sidestick, 2x TCA Airbus Throttle quads, PFC Cirrus Pedals, Coolermaster HAF932 case

Portable Sys3 (P3Dv4/FSX/DCS): i9-9900K @ 5.0 Ghz, Noctua NH-D15, 32GB 3200/16, EVGA RTX3090, Dell S2417DG 24" GSync
Corsair RM850x PSU, TM TCA Officer Pack, Saitek combat pedals, TM Warthog HOTAS, Coolermaster HAF XB case

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...