Sign in to follow this  
Mephic

Issue with 777 and Topcat (N1 discrepancy)

Recommended Posts

My issue on screenshot below - any ideas why the discrepancy? Temperatures matches each other so why such big delta? Due to that issue all values I get from TOPCAT are always different than what I get in triple 7 FMC (regardless if it's TO/DTO or temp way of reducing thrust. 

 

1z8jql.jpg

 

is it clearly a TOPCAT issue considering default % value in TOPCAT for full thrust is 96.0?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

The next question is on the Init Ref page is it the exact same engine Referenced between the two. I ask because there are many variations available and it's actually simpler to overlook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Engine in FMC GE90-110B1L2

Engine in TOPCAT: BOEING 777-200LR GE90-110B1L

 

Is this different? I mean I use PMDG 777 and I thought TOPCAT is compatible... is it possible to choose different engine for PMDG?? 

 

One more interesting thing is DTO, DTO1 and DTO2 are OK. Temp derates are wrong. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say check and see if there is a different Topcat profile. I'd have to check and see what's available anymore. Do you mean TO, TO 1, TO 2 are correct and the assumed temp variant (D) are incorrect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Sir. If I set TO, TO1, TO2 it matches (there is 0.4 delta - higher in 777 when not running packs, I guess it's due to lack of air conditioning load same as in NGX) . But always delta is same and after engines are started and packs on there is a match. 

 

Temperatures are wrong. 

 

When you say different topcat profile - I'm using default from 2.74 not sure what else and where could be available but I thought this is the one which will be spot on 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which profile did you get? Might be a better one out by now. I really piped in because I saw the discrepancy between Topcat calling for TO2 and the selected TO in the CDU. I'm sure there is multiple profiles. Who knows maybe the Topcat profile you have wasn't updated after a SP published by PMDG that addressed some performance issues.

My suggestion would be to find the most current profile in use though with the highest download rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What version of Topcat do you have installed?  Seems they updated it in 2.74.  If its the latest and greatest I'd let them know the goofed in their numbers.  You might even be able to open the profile yourself and adjust some variables and find the "sweet spot."

 

http://www.topcatsim.com/forum/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Temperatures matches each other so why such big delta?

 

Because, as mentioned, the TOPCAT N1 is for TO2, not full TO as you have selected.

 

There are many variables, not least the fact that as also mentioned above the TOPCAT profile is not for the same engines as those used in the PMDG.

 

Plus, there are many, many variables at play. For a start, the FS atmosphere and engine model are far from exact. I don't know how accurately PMDG have been able to model the engines but I would hazard a guess there is an excellent chance that even if you used the real Boeing OPT software you would struggle to get a precise match in all conditions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, again , as mentioned in next post even if I choose it difference is huge. 

 

In case of NGX it is correct in all conditions so IMO it's just a bug. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because, as mentioned, the TOPCAT N1 is for TO2, not full TO as you have selected.

 

There are many variables, not least the fact that as also mentioned above the TOPCAT profile is not for the same engines as those used in the PMDG.

 

Plus, there are many, many variables at play. For a start, the FS atmosphere and engine model are far from exact. I don't know how accurately PMDG have been able to model the engines but I would hazard a guess there is an excellent chance that even if you used the real Boeing OPT software you would struggle to get a precise match in all conditions.

 

All our products have the exact performance tables from Boeing inside the FMC - there is no guarantee this is going to match whatever other performance calculator is being used unless they also use exactly the same data. We've run into this a bunch in the 747 development - testers saying it doesn't match PFPX/TOPCAT etc - you can't argue with the real data from Boeing, which ours matches.

 

We keep talking internally about making a performance calculator/OPT type thing specifically for our products. At some point maybe we'll do it.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A discrepancy with the TOPCAT profile maybe. Not with the PMDG model. Topcat is supposed to derive its numbers from the aircraft they are modeling not the other way around. As I said might be best to see if you have the latest progile from them first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We keep talking internally about making a performance calculator/OPT type thing specifically for our products. At some point maybe we'll do it.

 

money2vu42.jpg

 

You got one customer!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this