Sign in to follow this  
Tom Allensworth

What do you think of the Livery on the A380?

Recommended Posts

Not quite as catchy as Boeing's Dreamliner series, but pretty cool nonetheless.Colours are close as well.What do you all think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

I don't, I watched it live on the German feed.I should have snapped a screenshot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is more interesting is the approach to the problem. Boeing have elected for a long range 250 seater which can go point to point while Airbus have elected for a 550 plus seater which can only go hub to hub with interconnecting flights to final destination.These Giant carriers of the sky worry me especially since 9/11 as transporting that volume of people is bound to lead to long check in times and long loading times.Such an aircraft would be a major taget by terrorists as a disaster to such a volume people carrier would be terrible.On top of all that the airports will have to be modified as will the terminals to take such huge aircraft and that also brings into question suitable alternatives for such big Birds!Peter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peter, actually this is totally off topic, I wasn't asking what you thought of the aircraft itself, but rather what you thought of the paintjob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it looks very conservative, it uses vaguely the Airbus logo and doesn't add a lot to it apart from the colors. Just my opinion,Francois

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind of like, please arrive at the airport 2 days prior to check-in. ;-)I still think it will be like living with someone in the next apartment above you. Quiet down you 300 people up there. :-)Oh and I like the Tail, but the rest is boring. I think the last sentence brings it home the best about having to modify airports and such. Is the European Conglomerate going to pay for those too?.JOIN The AVSIM RTW RACE FLIGHT TEAM****************Grab My FREEWARE Cessna 172 Voice recognition Profile here:[a href=http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?CatID=fs2004misc&DLID=58334]Cessna 172 Voice Profile[/a].You will need the main FREEWARE Flight Assistant program to use it, get it here:[a href=http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?CatID=genutils&DLID=39661]Flight Assistant 2.2[/a]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carioca,Thanks for posting the pic. I think the livery looks great--pity Airbus thought of it before some airline :)The A380 really is an exciting project. This is a worldwide project folks--if it succeeds, it's going to employ a lot of people from everywhere. One firm near my home in Phoenix supplies parts for both Boeing and Airbus--I'd like to think for the seatbelts, but the article was about a year back and I can't remember all the details.Can't wait to see how the 7e7 progresses too. Seeing new aircraft getting presented for the first time is exciting to any big aviation buff. I still remember how excited I was when the 747 was rolled out in the 60's. They were even giving away crude 747 models in cereal. Doubt my daughter will see an A380 model in hers :)-John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've spoken with luggage handlers at Schiphol who clearly state the inabillity to get an aircraft that large loaded and unloaded in anything approaching a reasonable time.Unless a direct conveyor belt system from automated container loading systems under the airport (which don't exist, most loading is manual) to the aircraft can be constructed the amount of luggage is just too great, adding quite some time to the turnaround cycle.Airbus claims how fuel efficient it is and it may be (but with the weight problems that could turn out to be empty promises) but if the aircraft spends hours extra on the ground in between flights the money saved on fuel quickly evaporates in parking fees and lost revenue.Additionally ever more airlines are starting to abandon the hub and spoke system as passengers more and more elect point to point service (which is one reason lowcost carriers who do this effectively already are so successful). Unless you have a market to fly 550+ passengers point to point without a large feeder system you're not going to be economically successful with the A380 if that trend continues.Some people have wondered about the 45 aircraft order for Emirates (which is a third of the total on order...) but I think they may plan to use them to ferry all those foreign workers from Pakistan and other Asian countries home and back to work that now require more flights. No hub and spoke there, at least not on the Emirates end, and no real competition on the routes either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>I've spoken with luggage handlers at Schiphol who clearly state the >inabillity to get an aircraft that large loaded and unloaded in >anything approaching a reasonable time.That's just a typical. Before they have even seen the aircraft they have decided that it is impossible. I guess it must be real efficient to have to load up two Boeings instead of one big Airbus, occupying more parking space, more runway time, more ATC resources, making the airspace more congested and releasing twice the noise to keep the neighbors happy.>Additionally ever more airlines are starting to abandon the>hub and spoke system as passengers more and more elect point>to point service (which is one reason lowcost carriers who do>this effectively already are so successful).So how come all the megahubs are seeing increased traffic numbers every year and are all expanding.>Unless you have a>market to fly 550+ passengers point to point without a large>feeder system you're not going to be economically successful>with the A380 if that trend continues.Alliances took care of the problem years ago. What's the big principal difference between a 747 with 450 passengers and an Airbus A380 with 550?-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of Luggage,I still think Aircraft this size i would not enjoy flying. I don't like flying on 747's either.There is very little compassion for someone once they exit a 747. You have 500 people going through 1 or 2 baggage claims trying to find 1000 pieces of luggage.Now picture 800 People with TODAY's Infrastructure, and close to 1600 Pieces of luggage. (Kind of takes away the wow factor, imho)I still don't think many airlines are going to want to build the type of infrastructure required of such a monstrosity. Now, if the European Conglomerate builds all of this instead of requiring the Airports and cities and airlines to build it, then maybe it has a chance. But I doubt they will.IMHO, this will be a Niche aircraft, with Cargo and the type of flights Jeroen spoke of.Once people fly it once, and stand in line for two hours or so trying to find their carry-on that would not fit because the overhead bins were full, and was stowed below, the wow factor will be gone, and mostly you will hear the complaints.UNLESS - The Airlines assign a baggage claim scan system or something that a passenger can scan their luggage claim ticket after departing the aircraft to tell them what claim area it is in. I simply cannot see them using the same old baggage claims as limited as they are right now. Today its already a hassle, now consider this monstrosity.Regards,Joe JOIN The AVSIM RTW RACE FLIGHT TEAM****************Grab My FREEWARE Cessna 172 Voice recognition Profile here:[a href=http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?CatID=fs2004misc&DLID=58334]Cessna 172 Voice Profile[/a].You will need the main FREEWARE Flight Assistant program to use it, get it here:[a href=http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?CatID=genutils&DLID=39661]Flight Assistant 2.2[/a]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joe,I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks of the discomfort large aircraft like the A380 and 747 cause in terms of the sheer mass of people traveling on the aircraft.There've been really cool pictures showing the A380 with lounges, mini "suites", bars, and other places to "stretch" our world weary legs. But face the truth, most airlines will maximize passenger capacity and they will come somewhere within the 600-700 passenger range.Those of us who remember the 747's introduction recall the same type of advance press--the "glory" shots of lounges and open space, and reality has proven anything but what was showed off to the public 40 years ago. It's a mass human hauler. Wonderful technology, but if airlines could cram 800 pax in a 747, they likely would.My last few transatlantic hops have been on 767 and I really enjoyed them, especially when loading and clearing customs. I think the 7e7 and A350, especially if both have the performance forecast, will probably become the aircraft of choice for all but the longest of flights.-John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OyvindCorrect me if I am wroung but 550 is the starting point while they go into operation.That will be increased to 800? laterPeter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this