Well, the amazing sale is on again, and I was wondering if anyone who had both the Moo and the Conquest could tell me if they're pretty close to the same quality. I know the conquest came out a bit before the Moo, but it wasn't that long, as I remember. 

 

Anyway, what do you all think about the comparison? I love my Moo and my Lear.

 

Thanks!

 

Scott

I have both. 

I fly the MU-2 more often. I think it looks better and is more fun to fly.

Their Lear is the best of the 3, if we're talking about rankings.

This is just my subjective view, but I'd say the Conquest is better than the Carenado version, this is the only Mitsubushi available (that I know of) and the Lear is really nice.

Can't go wrong really.

I prefer flying the C441 over the MU-2B, even though the MU-2B looks a little bit better. But I like that the cockpit of the C441 is less cramped, and it has a larger range.

Regarding systems depth they are quite similar now. The recent updates provided by Flysimware modernized the few things in the C441 where the MU-2B was better at first.

How about their Beech 18, any good? Is v4 compatible?

Thanks

Thank you everyone for your help!

 

:-)