MU-2 vs Conquest

Recommended Posts

Well, the amazing sale is on again, and I was wondering if anyone who had both the Moo and the Conquest could tell me if they're pretty close to the same quality. I know the conquest came out a bit before the Moo, but it wasn't that long, as I remember. 


Anyway, what do you all think about the comparison? I love my Moo and my Lear.





Share this post

Link to post
Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

I have both. 

I fly the MU-2 more often. I think it looks better and is more fun to fly.

Their Lear is the best of the 3, if we're talking about rankings.

This is just my subjective view, but I'd say the Conquest is better than the Carenado version, this is the only Mitsubushi available (that I know of) and the Lear is really nice.

Can't go wrong really.

Share this post

Link to post

I prefer flying the C441 over the MU-2B, even though the MU-2B looks a little bit better. But I like that the cockpit of the C441 is less cramped, and it has a larger range.

Regarding systems depth they are quite similar now. The recent updates provided by Flysimware modernized the few things in the C441 where the MU-2B was better at first.

Share this post

Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now