September 4, 20178 yr Hi there, I've just bought a SSD and GTX1080ti with the view of upgrading from FSX SE to P3D V4. I have however noticed when I've just gone onto the recommended specifications on the LM website that they are recommending DDR4 2666 ram? I have 16 GB DDR3 1600 ram and was not looking for a complete PC Upgrade to run the sim. Has I meet or exceed all the other recommend specs, will I get good performance running DDR3 as opposed to the DDR4 2666? How crucial is it to have the latest ram to run the game? Thanks i7-4790K @ 4.4ghz/ Asus ROG Strix GTX1080ti 11GB/16GB DDR3-1600 Kingston Hyper X Savage/Asus Maximus VII Ranger/Corsair H80i AIO Cooler/Corsair 780T Case
September 4, 20178 yr Moderator You should be fine. As with anything, the faster the better but you should still have a very good experience.My #2 system is 1600 DDR3 - runs like a champ. Vic RIG#1 - I9 14900K MSI Pro z790 RTX 5070Ti 40" 4K Monitor 3840x2160
September 4, 20178 yr I also have DDR3 1600 and an older gtx 970 (see specs in sig) and I'm very happy with P3Dv4 performance. Always want more but my CPU / GPU loads are running with plenty of margin. [CPL] : I9-9900K @5.0GHz HT ON, Maximus XI Hero, ASUS TUF RTX4080 OC, 32GB DDR4 3200 14, 1TB NVMe SSD, 500GB SSD, 1TB HDD, 40" Samsung 4K TV, Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Logitech Rudder Pedals, WIN11
September 4, 20178 yr Gains in CPU/GPU performance can be measured in 25-250% increase in FPS performance, RAM speed variances are measured in 5-10% increase in FPS performance. For flight simulators bus saturation usually isn't a problem so long as you have reasonably good latency. System RAM usage I have not exceeded 16GB yet (around 14GB total usage). For VRAM usage I've hit a peak of 11GB. Cheers, Rob.
September 4, 20178 yr P3D will run just fine on DDR3 RAM, it's the CPU and the GPU which really make the difference on frame rates for ESP-based sims. I've had P3D V4 run on a computer with only 4 Gb of RAM and it was still clocking 125 fps, so more and faster RAM would probably have only meant it loaded quicker, rather than ran faster or smoother. Lockheed Martin's recommended specs are exactly that, recommendations rather than a necessity. Software companies always go large on recommended specs for their software so that they don't get complaints from people about things running less than brilliantly if they recommend anything less. Alan Bradbury Check out my youtube flight sim videos: Here
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.