December 16, 20178 yr 1 hour ago, RALF9636 said: It's been a while since I flew the NGX (flying Airbus now) but I remember that to me it felt more like flying an F-18 with the default settings, in particular the roll-rate. At least according to my imagination - I have no real world experience with aircraft like that of course. So I increased pitch_stability and roll_stability until it felt heavy enough for me. Was that more realistic? I don't know, but it felt better to me and met my expeciations. Of course there are a lot of factors relevant here: Controller type, calibration, slope, sensitivity etc., last but not least your own expectations. I recommend to just play around with these values and look if it feels better to you. After all it should feel like you want it to feel. Thanks RALF. I have never even looked in the NGX config. I would imagine that the base numbers are not the same as those you posted above...or am I wrong. To make it heavier would you increase the number or lower it. Just trying to save myself a little time and testing. Never mind, I re-read your post. Ken Thompson i7-4790 @4 GHz 64 Bit Win 7 16G RAM GTX 1080Ti
December 17, 20178 yr Would be interesting to see what some of the ATP guys would recommend? Assuming it would be Majestic, PMDG, FS Labs and a few one offs like LHS, Level D, and Perhaps Cool Sky DC9 or A2A Silver Wing Series? RE Thomason Jr.
December 17, 20178 yr Author 59 minutes ago, Blaze said: Would be interesting to see what some of the ATP guys would recommend? Assuming it would be Majestic, PMDG, FS Labs and a few one offs like LHS, Level D, and Perhaps Cool Sky DC9 or A2A Silver Wing Series? Yeah, I've seen pilots that cover the spectrum...private, business and commercial...on the site. I was hoping some of them would chime n. Gregg Seipp "A good landing is when you can walk away from the airplane. A great landing is when you can reuse it." i9 64GB RAM, GTX-5090
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.