April 9, 20188 yr 2 hours ago, Cactus521 said: Maybe one day I will purchase the Q400, I have heard so many good things about it! Now that I have the hardware to run it. John Surprisingly John, despite its very advanced level of development, the Majestic Q400 is not particularly resource intensive - another feature that helps to make this arguably the best turboprop on the market. Bill
April 10, 20188 yr 1 hour ago, scianoir said: Surprisingly John, despite its very advanced level of development, the Majestic Q400 is not particularly resource intensive - another feature that helps to make this arguably the best turboprop on the market. Bill That is very good, I wonder how much use it gets in the US?
April 10, 20188 yr 10 hours ago, Cactus521 said: Now that I have the hardware to run it. I think the Q400 is the best performing study level plane there is so it might even have worked with your old hardware. The impact it has is nothing like the impact PMDG or FSLabs planes have: it's more like A2A's Comanche. I sometimes even wonder if it has any impact on performance at all. So also in THIS regard it is the best addon plane ever (imho).
April 10, 20188 yr Commercial Member Yes, the MJC very good design running things outside of the sim. Can't find anything to grumble at there with my technical hat on. Steve Waite: Engineer at codelegend.com
April 10, 20188 yr I can't understand why other Dev. are not following the MJC way for doing new complex aircrafts. Mike Mike Lab WIN10 / I7-6700K HT ON / GTX980 / 16 GB RAM / 3 x SAMSUNG EVO 1TB SSD / 1 X WD BLACK 2TB HDD / 32" 60hz Monitor @ 2560x1440 / P3Dv4.4 No AM, Locked to 59 FPS, VSync ON, Triple buffering enabled Process Lasso used to unload all other applications than P3D running on core 0
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.