Bye Bye Miss America Pie

[bean_sprout 1,201]

"There are those that care about internet security and those that will."  anon

Regards
bs

Edited February 1, 2019 by bean_sprout

[udidwht 133]

12 minutes ago, vortex681 said:

Did you read the linked article? I quote: "The reason why the execution of such code is accomplished automatically and without user intervention...". Yes, you have to go to the website in the first place but many otherwise legitimate sites have been compromised over the years.

Still have to hit the site that's been hacked.

 

Stay off the porn sites. LOL!

[vortex681 806]

12 minutes ago, udidwht said:

Still have to hit the site that's been hacked.

 

Stay off the porn sites. LOL!

Many perfectly legitimate sites have been hacked over the years. It's naive to think that only porn sites are vulnerable to this kind of attack. See: https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/websites-likely-infect-malware/ and http://www.nbcnews.com/id/52322179/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/malware-mostly-comes-legitimate-websites/.

Edited February 1, 2019 by vortex681

[ckyliu 1,749]

2 hours ago, Luke said:

192.168.0.20; have fun. Good luck getting through the NAT.

Damnit you beat me to it, I was going to say 192.168.0.1 😂 

[udidwht 133]

4 hours ago, vortex681 said:

Many perfectly legitimate sites have been hacked over the years. It's naive to think that only porn sites are vulnerable to this kind of attack. See: https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/websites-likely-infect-malware/ and http://www.nbcnews.com/id/52322179/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/malware-mostly-comes-legitimate-websites/.

That article has a lot of holes in it. A lot.

[vortex681 806]

5 hours ago, udidwht said:

That article has a lot of holes in it. A lot.

Such as? Which article (there were two)? If you're going to disagree with people, you need to back up your comments.

Edited February 1, 2019 by vortex681

[udidwht 133]

On 2/1/2019 at 2:26 AM, vortex681 said:

Such as? Which article (there were two)? If you're going to disagree with people, you need to back up your comments.

Simple wordage.

One only needs to read it carefully to see the holes.

[vortex681 806]

7 hours ago, udidwht said:

Simple wordage.

One only needs to read it carefully to see the holes.

So both articles were wrong? What holes (as I clearly missed them)?