La Guardia

[Zimmerbz 168]

Which of the 2 versions of KLGA available is most current in terms of the real world terminal layout?  Thanks

[downscc 1,327]

The ImagineSim is actually representative of the final planned terminal configuration.  The other one is obsolete.

[Benjamin J 751]

5 minutes ago, downscc said:

The ImagineSim is actually representative of the final planned terminal configuration.  The other one is obsolete.

Which one is 'the other one'? If you mean DD, isn't it portraying exactly the same thing as IS? Which is to say, LGA after the construction is done?

I will add that IS's LGA looks a whole lot nicer than DD's, which is the one I have. I don't really fly there because the textures are quite simplistic and the airport looks a little bare - which is all because they are trying to model something which isn't complete yet!

[okupton 318]

This doesn’t exactly answer your question, but I’ve got the DD version and don’t like it very much. Can’t comment on the imaginesim offering since I don’t have it. 

[micstatic 4,340]

I like the IS one.  Though when flying to that part of the country I most often pick FlyTampa Boston.  But the last flight out of LGA was a real joy.  Did the Whitestone climb departure in a 777-200LR headed to Montreal!

[ZLA Steve 377]

Both are current as of 2024. The DD version is less impactful on performance, while the IS version is visually superior.

Decide what matters more to you as they are both well made and priced fairly.

[feisty 2]

Imaginesim's LGA is missing the new Easterly Terminal building which has just about completed construction and is visible from the GCP.  don't know what else might be missing.  Just saying

[micstatic 4,340]

That’s what I don’t like about imaginesim. Other than atl they seem to never update their products. Also no forum.